Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: In Crunch Time, Spurs Don't Change Their Game

The Final Cuts

The Oilers made what will likely end up being their final cuts earlier today, sending two players directly to Oklahoma City - Linus Omark and Chris Vande Velde - and placing another six on waivers - Ryan O'Marra, Liam Reddox, Ben Ondrus, Alexandre Giroux, Shawn Belle, and Richard Petiot - with the same purpose in mind.  The Oilers' roster now stands at 24, but with J-F Jacques likely to start the year on injured reserve, this should be it for cuts.  You'll notice that there isn't a single goaltender on the list.  Tom Renney had been consistent throughout camp about wanting to start the season with two goalies, and yet here we are with three goalies on the roster heading into the regular season.  Good grief.  It would be one thing if Jeff Deslauriers and Devan Dubnyk had both shown well as professionals.  But guess what, they haven't.  Neither guy looks like he'll be average let alone elite.  Given the goaltending market over the last several seasons, there's really no point in clinging to these guys.  Like I said yesterday, the time to make a decision on these guys came and went a long time ago.  It seems crazy to me that they still can't pull the trigger.  Then again, the team did get a quality minor-league player (who ended up being a quality NHL player when he was healthy enough to play), a middling draft pick, and an AHL goalie the last time they had three goalies.  Maybe Tambellini thinks he can do it again.  I don't think he will, but hey, I've been wrong before.  After the jump, we'll take a look at the significant battles and who emerged victorious.

Star-divide

Theo Peckham def. Richard Petiot and Shawn Belle - This was the result I expected at the start of camp, and despite some decent play from Petiot and Belle, Peckham ended up coming out on top.  Belle's injury no doubt hurt his chances, but Petiot played and played well.  Some folks were convinced it was well enough to win a job, and I'd imagine Petiot thought so too.  That he didn't get it might be called "politics" but I think it has more to do with familiarity.  I've never been impressed by Peckham, but the coaches seemed like they found his play late last season encouraging, and that kind of positive history is a big advantage.  That said, is Peckham the best choice?  In Petiot's exit interview, he mentioned the coaches asking him to be "a little more physical" which I found pretty surprising since Petiot is in fact a somewhat physical player.  He may not be as physical as Peckham I suppose, but he also doesn't puts himself out of position to make hits nearly as often.  Based on ability alone, I think it's a tough call, but given the age of each player, I think the Oilers made the right one.

Talent Requirement def. Alexandre Giroux, Chris Vande Velde, Ryan O'Marra, and Ben Ondrus - Alexandre Giroux talked a lot about not scoring goals costing him a job.  That's true to some extent, but I think the that the big problem for him is that the same things that cause him to have trouble scoring in the NHL also cost him all over the ice.  He's not quick enough on his feet, and not quick enough in making decisions.  He's just not that good.  A one-way contract may have helped his chances slightly since there's no money to be saved in sending him down, but it sure seemed like he was slated for the AHL from the start.  Chris Vande Velde is better than the other two schleps, a legitimate prospect.  But let's face it, the Oilers didn't want another rookie starting the year.  Maybe he can earn an extended call-up later in the year (although I'd bet against it).  For the other two guys: just not that good.

Indecision and Ryan Jones def. Liam Reddox - Liam Reddox is a bit of a different story from the guys mentioned above.  He doesn't have an interview up on the Oilers' site, and I'm thinking that might be a lesson he learned from watching Bambi: if you don't have anything nice to say... you know the rest.  He's the only guy I picked to make the team when camp began that's on his way to the minors today, and I feel bad for the guy because he played well.  That said, I'm happy the Oilers kept Jones because I think he could be a pretty good player.  He's got some jam, he's pretty quick, he's scored at lower levels, and he's got a proven ability to draw penalties.  No qualms there for sure.  What really killed Reddox was management's indecision on the goalie front.  JDDDD has his spot.  Then again, it's hard to complain too much if you're Reddox.  After all, the only reason he had a shot at a job is because the Oilers decided not to sign a veteran or two in the off-season.

"Politics" and Hype def. Linus Omark - The guy never played with "top nine guys" through camp and in last night's game he played 12:36, besting only Ondrus, MacIntyre, and O'Marra.  Before last night's game, it was clear that he wasn't going to be playing with the Oilers to start the year.  When your coach says, "Flashes are great, but you've got to be a complete player when you're out there for forty second shifts," you know you're getting cut no matter what.  That said, his exit interview is pretty awesome.  He talked about the North American camp having more "politics" than he was accustomed to, which is pretty damning when you consider he played last year in the not-every-team-paid-its-players KHL.  When he was asked if he was given a fair opportunity to play in an offensive role, he said, "I don't want to discuss that, but I want to play a lot, so that's what I'm going to say," or if I were to paraphrase, "No."  When he was asked it the Oilers' organization is the best place for him right now, he said, "Ehhhhhhmmmm.  No comment."  Definitely two sentences.  I don't blame him for feeling that way.  On the one hand, it's understandable that the three wunderkinds get special treatment, but it sure would be galling to hear the coach tell you that you need to be a complete player to make the team and then watch an overwhelmed Taylor Hall skate off with your job.  One of the best reasons Tyler gave for sending Hall back to junior was the opportunity cost to other players in the organization.  Linus Omark - who's almost certainly more ready than Hall for the NHL at the present time - getting no chance to play with offensive players in camp, and being forced to start the year in the AHL is a prime example.  

What About Waivers - We'll know tomorrow if the six who needed to clear are in fact on their way to Oklahoma City.  If they do in fact make it, none of the six would need to clear re-entry waivers on the way back up.  But the Oilers aren't the only team with players on waivers today, and there's at least one player that I'd be very pleased to see the Oilers claim: Matt Pelech.  Pelech was put on waivers by the Flames earlier today, and I think he could be a pretty good player.  Not only that, but claiming him puts a dent in a division rival's depth.  He was drafted 26th overall in 2005, and he's a big man at 6'5'' and 216 lbs.  He's a defensive blueliner, and led the Abbotsford Heat defenders in +/- one year ago (min. 40 games, he was +7), and also played in five games with the Flames.  If they wanted him, how could they clear a spot?  Well, there are a couple of ways, but the Oilers seem unwilling to do either.  Steve MacIntyre and Jason Strudwick are here to stay, but they'd be my options for demotion.  The other is, of course, the goalie.  If the Oilers were in fact willing to make a call, it would be great to use the extra spot on a young defender like Pelech for at least the first month of the season.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

A bad day as far as I am concerned. I understand Peckham and the writing was on the wall for Omark months ago, at least he should get a shot as soon as someone in the top nine goes down with an injury.

But keeping three goalies instead of Reddox? Brutal. And yeah I get that Reddox is likely a fourth liner at best. But he’s got everything that this team needs – he hustles, he has guts, blocks shots, PKs all of that good stuff. And to be dropped because Tambo still doesn’t know which kid goalie to keep? Come on.

I hope Reddox gets claimed by another club, gets a fair shot and does well. And I hope that Tambellini is out of a job come next summer. I’m sick of it.

by Pat Mc on Oct 4, 2010 5:36 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

If Ersberg can clear waivers I’m sure one of DD/JDD can. Even if he can’t that’s one less team likely to need DD/JDD.

The Oilers are wasting a roster spot here.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

by dawgbone98 on Oct 4, 2010 6:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

and potential development for both goalies for just warming the bench more than required.
The most glaring goalie job opportunity was in Minny. Now I see no other team who will want to claim JDD.

Sins can be forgiven but conscience is a killer.

by SumOil on Oct 4, 2010 6:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Nashville as well.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

by dawgbone98 on Oct 4, 2010 9:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah but i doubt they will pay a goalie 1 million to be their backup. If they did not pick up gerber, i think it is a good bet that they wont pick up JDD either.

Sins can be forgiven but conscience is a killer.

by SumOil on Oct 5, 2010 7:16 AM MDT up reply actions  

Like I said, Ersberg was available as well, so if he didn’t get claimed I think JDD is safe.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

by dawgbone98 on Oct 5, 2010 7:42 AM MDT up reply actions  

Remember, Steve Tambellini thinks you win hockey games by being tall and Liam Reddox is 5’11".

by Benjamin Massey on Oct 4, 2010 7:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

Theory

Steve Tambellini was employed by the Vancouver Grizzlies. As the team was packing up to move to Tennessee, he wandered down the hallway and into the Canucks’ offices. Brian Burke mistook him for someone else and told him to “get back to work”. Tambellini, not being sure what exactly to do, sort of hung around the office for seven years, pointing out tall guys on lists of prospects and never collecting a paycheque. He was introduced as the Edmonton Oilers GM in July, 2008.

by Passive Voice on Oct 4, 2010 10:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

I doubt Reddox gets picked up, but it would be a pretty fitting price for the Oilers to pay if he does – so afraid that they’re going to lose a goalie for nothing, they end up losing somebody else. To be honest, I’d prefer a waiver pickup to Reddox, so I won’t complain too loudly about his demotion. Still, I find the inability to decide between two pretty mediocre (if we’re generous) goalies tiresome.

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 4, 2010 7:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

For all my dismay to see the 3-headed hydra resurrected, is it possible that the brain trust are so dismayed at Khabibulin’s poor form that they are going to send him down for conditioning while JDDDD take turns, after which one will be sent down and someone else brought up (Reddox) when Khabi returns. Additionally, because the season would have already begun, this may have the advantage of making a waiver claim for whichever goalie is sent down less likely.
Or is that just a poor rationalisation of an absurd situation?

by Yeti# on Oct 4, 2010 6:07 PM MDT reply actions  

I thought the same thing – conditioning for Khabibulin if he plays terrible.

by book!e on Oct 4, 2010 8:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

But if they want to win, Gerber outplayed everyone.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 4, 2010 8:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Gerber could be brought up for 9 games with no worries about waivers. With that said – they probably want to spend more time assessing JDDDD.

by book!e on Oct 4, 2010 9:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeti – a reasonable point except I presume that if they assign him for conditioning then it doesn’t cost them a roster spot. I could be wrong though.

And maybe Reddox doesn’t get claimed – I thought he would last year and he did not. He had good buzz around him this camp though, Bob MacKenzie even mentioned this fact.

by Pat Mc on Oct 4, 2010 6:15 PM MDT reply actions  

Players on conditioning assignments do still count as part of the active roster, so it would cost them a roster spot to use Yeti’s plan. They would also need the player to agree to go down, which Khabibulin may or may not agree to. Even if he would, I’d be very surprised if that’s the plan. It would be sort of odd to send last year’s MVP down for conditioning after all.

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 4, 2010 7:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

So let me understand this…the Oilers are wasting two roster spots on a team that is supposedly devoted to development?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 4, 2010 6:21 PM MDT reply actions  

i doubt those 2 roster spots would be taken by any prospect of note anyways. Its better that Omark plays in the A rather than sit on the bench. Also Petiot vs Strudwick, definitely Petiot, but oh well, he is not our prospect.

I remember, when John Willis used to manage Hockey or Die, he had put up a post saying that a team needs at least 8 competent D and 15 competent F throughout the season. so i am sure that the guys who should have made it, will get their chance.

Sins can be forgiven but conscience is a killer.

by SumOil on Oct 4, 2010 6:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Strudwick

Oops, three roster spots.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 4, 2010 6:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

The truely funny part is, based on how they’ve played so far, Hall should have been sent down and Omark kept in the NHL.

Omark has been playing in equivilant leagues to the AHL (and doing well) for the past 2 years. What’s a 3rd going to give him?

If anyone has made a case for needing to develop in the NHL it’s probably Omark.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

by dawgbone98 on Oct 4, 2010 9:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

This team doesn’t deserve to win.

by Benjamin Massey on Oct 4, 2010 6:41 PM MDT reply actions  

You’re in luck! They won’t!

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 4, 2010 6:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

the thing about players like peckham is that they are available on waivers. Like oilers spent years developing him, Tampa spent time on Mihalik, Calgary on Pelech. So putting peckham on waivers and claiming the others is not really a bad move.

Sins can be forgiven but conscience is a killer.

by SumOil on Oct 5, 2010 9:47 AM MDT reply actions  

It is if he pans out.

Even though Petiot is slightly ahead of Peckham now, what about 2 years from now? Guys like Petiot/Belle are available all the time as well.

The Oilers are better off making sure Peckham is/isn’t a player than they are worrying about Petiot or Belle.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

by dawgbone98 on Oct 5, 2010 9:51 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence
Small
Is Ryan Murray more NHL-ready than we think?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL