Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Cody Wild vs. Taylor Chorney Update

My last look at the Cody Wild vs. Taylor Chorney comparison brought me indirect flak from Rob Daum, The Pipeline Show and a couple of e-mailers.  The questions were valid then and they remain valid now.  Taylor Chorney continues to have trouble with the "defense" part of defenseman.  Theo Peckham is clear of him, Johan Motin is motoring on by, Jeff Petry is in the midst of revival Sunday and may pass him soon.  Cody Wild continues to outplay Chorney, and continues to languish at the end of the Springfield roster.  Taylor Chorney vs. Cody Wild, part II is below the break.

Star-divide

A look at the current stat line comparison shows that the "strides" Chorney is said to have taken may have been going the wrong direction.


GP G A P +/- PIM PPG PPA SOG PCT
2009-2010 - Taylor Chorney 17
3
4
7
-18 4 3
3 33
9.1%
2009-2010 - Cody Wild 31
0 12
12
-10 22
0 6
33
0.0%

 

Since we last looked at this comparison, Wild appeared in 23 games, tallying 8 assists, 3 of them on the power play.  He's been a -7 over that span.  Chorney appeared in 13 games, scored a power play goal and added a power play assist.  He posted a -14 in those games.  Chorney has 1 even strength point in 17 games this year and has been non-existent in even strength situations..

Until we get the official AHL Qualcomp for this season, we can't be sure, but by combing through the box scores, it looks as if Wild is alternating between the second and third pairing.  He continues to play second grouping power play time.  Chorney has played consistent second pairing minutes and been on the primary power play pairing.

Yet during the December to remember for the Falcons, it was Cody Wild that "earned" himself four healthy scratches.  Chorney was not scratched until coming down with a case of the flu that's kept him out of the lineup recently.  Wild's mediocre play has earned him nine healthy scratches from coach Rob Daum this year.  Chorney's abysmal play has kept him in the lineup all year.

It's completely possible that Chorney has been getting Horcoff'd by his goalies with some extremely low even strength save percentage for the last two seasons.  It's also completely possible that Chorney is not ready for AHL play, and he's just a power play specialist a la Rob Schremp.  I remain wildly interested as this unfolds because it's yet another reason to look to advanced stats.  I only wish that we had access to the advanced stats for the American Hockey League.

My questions on the subject caused The Pipeline Show to ask Rob Daum about it.  Daum's answer:

I think they have the same defensive deficiencies from a positional standpoint and the ability to defend.  I think Taylor has made strides in those areas that Cody hasn't quite been able to master at this point.

Say who in the what now?  Absolutely none of the organizational statements about Taylor Chorney match up to his on-ice perfomance thus far as a professional.  In 75 AHL games, he's -47; Cody Wild is a -24 in 90 games.

My conclusion in the last look holds:

For the last two years Taylor Chorney has been buried at evens in Springfield, yet continues to get an organizational push.  Cody Wild, in the same role, has done a bit better than Chorney, but has endured healthy scratches...

 

Just for reference, here is the compared stat line for Chorney and Wild from the 2008-2009 season:


GP G A P P/G +/- QUAL PIM PPG SOG PCT
2008-2009 - Taylor Chorney 68
5 16 21 .308 -29 1.751 22 3 84 .060
2008-2009 - Cody Wild 59
4 14 18 .305 -14 1.712 42 2 61 .066

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Chorney is giving someone some extra special treatment, I suppose.

RT40 writes with An Oilers Refinery and is an avid hockey fan.

by raventalon40 on Jan 9, 2010 11:51 AM MST reply actions  

Rightly or wrongly, it is certain that the org. measures their prospects’ development / potential in a different manner. It may be that they see Chorney’s deficiencies as technical issues which can be addressed, and Wild’s as something more fundamental which likely can’t be.

Just guessing, but there has to be some explanation for the differential treatment.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Jan 9, 2010 12:52 PM MST reply actions  

Maybe, but at some point, shouldn’t a fundamental flaw in a person’s game produce much worse than a simple technical flaw?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jan 9, 2010 1:25 PM MST up reply actions  

At some point, yes, absolutely it should. From the org.‘s perspective, the “some point” they’re interested in is in the future, specifically at the NHL level. Clearly they see Chorney >>> Wild in projecting that.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Jan 9, 2010 2:04 PM MST up reply actions  

Three different coaches have had a crack at fixing his game.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jan 9, 2010 6:41 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 54 34 15 5 73
Colorado 56 28 25 3 59
Minnesota 54 25 21 8 58
Calgary 55 25 22 8 58
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.11.2012 at 6:02 AM MST)

22 - 28 - 5

Won 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (14-5, .737)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (18-7, .720)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-13, .552)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-14,.333)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-40, .565)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (38-36, .514)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL