January 15, 1968
The Minnesota North Stars were taking on the California Seals at the Met Center. It was a typical game between the expansion teams of the era, with an odd combination of brilliance and sloppiness on display. That abrupt doubling and, soon, trebling of the league's size had rescued major-league calibre players from unjust obscurity, allowed older veterans to eke out a few successful years in an era of no pensions and working-class salaries, and thrust the mediocrities of the minor leagues into a spotlight they never deserved.
It seems unfair to say so in light of events, but Bill Masterton was one of the latter category. A centre from Winnipeg, a minor league lifer, alumnus of the University of Denver, point-per-game man with the Cleveland Barons of the American Hockey League in 1962-63, and former United States national team member, but never good enough for the NHL in the most competitive years of its history, not even good enough for the Montreal Canadiens to retain him as a useful farmhand they way they did so much of their talent in the 1960s. But expansion saved him. The North Stars' leading scorer was former Boston fourth liner Wayne Connelly, who scored thirty-five goals and still somehow finished -36, their star a somewhat eccentric goaltender from Trail by the name of Cesare Maniago who after two years as the New York Rangers' backup surged to a 22-16-9 campaign with a 2.77 goals-against average and who would star for the North Stars for almost a decade. In this group Masterton stood out as a solid role player who came as close to outscoring as any Minnesota forward that year would.
This was, we are so often told, a different age of the game, an age with a diluted talent pool, an age before mandatory helmets, an age of truculence and the old-time hockey that Slap Shot would later iconify. But what we saw January 15, 1968 was not a vicious act. Not even by today's standards, when Dion Phaneuf elbows a guy in the chops and the crowd roars while the reporters tut sternly. Masterton had his head down and Seals defenseman Ron Harris caught Masterton with shoulder check that hit the North Stars centre absolutely flush. As he stumbled, Harris's defensive partner Larry Cahan hit Masterton almost simultaneously and probably accidentally, knocking the winded Masterton off balance. He fell, and his bare head hit the ice, and he died, forty-two years ago today.
It was a clean hit, we are told. Nor has it been hockey's only tragedy. Fellow AJHL fans will remember Trevor Elton, late captain of the Sherwood Park Crusaders, killed on a clean hit by the St. Albert Saints. You certainly know the name Don Sanderson, striking the ice after a fight just over a year ago, or Aleksei Cherepanov and his accidental hit to the chest turned cardiac arrest, or those innumerable others from across the minor and junior leagues who time has forgotten. Hockey is not alone in its ability to make tragedy out of joy, but it may be alone in the reverence accorded to those it has taken. Perhaps it is meaningful that, while most sports treat an award for perseverance and sportsmanship as a second-rate prize, the Bill Masterton Trophy is accorded the respect and even the debate worthy of the Hart or the Vezina.The only thing more constant than memory is the same understandable, unforgettable rallying cry: never again. Masterton is remembered not only by the trophy that bears his name, or the number nineteen hanging from the American Airlines Center, or even the $2,500 scholarship handed out in his honour every year, but by the helmet worn by every major league hockey player since Craig MacTavish's retirement. It was not science or medicine but the fate of Masterton, and the other forgotten tragedies, and even the near brushes like that suffered by Ted Green from Wayne Maki. Here we are not alone. Other sports have had similar experiences; when Ray Mancini killed Duk Koo Kim in the boxing ring, the once-iconic fifteen championship rounds had been reduced to twelve by 1989 in response.
But it's interesting, the way these things go. Duk Koo Kim died after a fourteen-round fight, but his death was caused by his being an overmatched and overweight but determined fighter with a lethargic corner man who decided his first ever fight outside of South Korea should be in Las Vegas against the lightweight champion of the world with power so feared he was nicknamed "Boom-Boom". A helmet might have saved Bill Masterton, but Trevor Elton was wearing one the night he died. So was Don Sanderson, until it slipped off.
This, too, other sports are familiar with: just ask the family of Mexican featherweight Daniel Aguillón, killed by an Alejandro Sanabria uppercut in the twelfth round on October 20, 2008. Yet even in boxing, we hear the tut-tuts of the experts: twelve round fights are inherently dangerous. Reduce them to ten. Or eight, or six, or however many it takes until the boxers of the world can sit at home in their bathrobes, safe in the knowledge that they need never face danger again.
Contact sports have an inevitable and even desirable element of risk. Hockey is popular not least because of its crunching bodychecks, its thundering slapshots, and even its fights, each of which can and has killed somebody who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Add this to the simple risks of athletic activity, the strain it places on the heart and the rest of the body, and you have an activity that will claim lives from time to time no matter how much we grieve.
Don Sanderson of the Whitby Dragons died January 2, 2009, because he was in a fight, and his helmet wasn't done up properly, and he lost his grip at precisely the wrong moment, and the one-in-a-million chance came through. He was not a child, and he was not a millionaire. He was a senior hockey player in Ontario. When you play for the Whitby Dragons or a team like them, you're well beyond doing it for a living and into doing it for love. The same with Bill Masterton, who plugged away for years in the minors, training when he could get time away from his real job, toiling with the knowledge that in the six-team NHL he could never possibly make the show, because hockey was important. The same with Trevor Elton, twenty years old, playing tier II junior as an overager, his professional career over before it had begun but taking the ice anyway because it was what he wanted. So why must every tragedy in sport be met by changing that sport, by turning what these men loved into something different, by honouring their memories with knee-jerk hysteria, by turning "never again" into a cry for desperate, ineffective, and even counter-productive action rather than a chance to advertise the risks in this sport of ours, so that whatever the inevitable next tragedy may be, at least we cannot say they weren't fully aware of the possibility?
5 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Fantastic article Ben. You know your history, and your stuff. If this is the kind of retaliation I can expect every time I tiptoe trepidatiously into your territory (e.g. my recent attempt at humour), keep it coming.
Boxing will be safe when the fights are zero rounds. Somehow I doubt that will satisfy the participants or anybody who loves that sport. I’ve seen a guy die while diving, and another judging tennis. As the old saying goes, shit happens. It totally sucks when it does, but let’s face it, life is dangerous. Take sensible precautions, and carry on. Learn what you can learn.
Which is always an iffy proposition. NHLers put on helmets (eventually) after Bill Masterton died, as did major league baseball players in the aftermath of Ray Chapman. However, nobody wears a neck guard in the aftermath of Trent McCleary or Richard Zednik or Mark Goodkey, may he rest in peace.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
(Oops, hit “post” instead of “preview”)
One could argue that today, 42 years after Bill Masterton died, the NHL still has a fairly undeveloped policy towards head injuries generally. Head shots are not illegal per se. Fighting is just a 5 minute penalty. Proper securing of helmets remains optional, as do visors. Full face shields and neck guards are outside of some archaic code. Mouth guards are a fashion accessory.
New information continues to pile up, such as Reg Fleming’s autopsy report or the ongoing saga of Keith Primeau. “The Next One” has long since been driven from the game, and still the league is slow to respond. The IIHF has left the NHL in the dust when it comes to progressive policies towards player safety.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Jan 15, 2010 5:56 PM PST up reply actions
Even with such clear, medically-founded issues as “if you wear a helmet, you’re less likely to suffer serious brain trauma”, I’m reluctant to institute major changes.
Is there something to the argument that players become more careless the more protected they are? We don’t know. Instinctually we say “no” but we’ve all seen a guy do something dangerous near a buddy because “ah, there’s no way he’ll get hurt by that” and then all of a sudden he does. Like the man who threw himself through a bullet-proof window to show how bullet-proof it was, only it wasn’t and he fell out of a building.
by Benjamin Massey on Jan 15, 2010 7:51 PM PST up reply actions
And don’t worry, I plan to leave most of the hockey history stuff to the professional around here rather than the twenty-three year old idiot.
by Benjamin Massey on Jan 15, 2010 7:52 PM PST up reply actions
I don’t think it has anything to do with protective equipment – I think people are just likely to be stupid because we all suck at assessing probabilities and judging the consequences.
I have worked in many laboratories, and have seen many people who know better not wearing gloves when, say, pouring a chemical from a large container into a smaller one because “they are going to be very careful and it won’t spill on their hands, so they don’t need gloves” – and far more often than not they are fine. I have used an office chair with wheels on it as a stepstool to reach a high shelf, even though I knew perfectly well that it could roll and I could fall off and hit my head on the floor and I knew there was a stepstool in the next room – but that was the next room, I was in a hurry, and after all, what are the odds that on this particular day I would fall and hurt myself? And of course, each time nothing happens, it convinces people that much more solidly that next time nothing will happen, either.
I think the protective equipment fostering lack of caution isn’t the right argument – I think that people just are prone to take chances because it seems quicker, easier, or more comfortable (such as not wearing bike helmets), and the chances of something bad happening that exact time are small, so they will probably be fine. People die in car accidents even if they are wearing seatbelts, but that doesn’t make them a bad idea. Hockey players will still get concussions if there is more protection in the form of equipment and rules, but that doesn’t mean that since you can’t reduce the incidence of serious injuries to zero you throw up your hands and give up – you reduce it as much as you can and then put medical policies in place to support and pay for treatment for those injuries that are inevitable, I believe.
"While there's life, there's hope." --Cicero
Agreed, great article Ben. Thanks for posting this.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
I agree with the rest of the gallery giving you the standing ovation. Really good stuff Ben.
by Scott Reynolds on Jan 16, 2010 10:06 AM PST reply actions

by 























