Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

Too Many Bodies

The last few years Oilers fans have had some experience with the 50-contract limit.  According to the CBA, any team in the NHL may have no more than fifty players signed to an NHL contract at any one time.  This has been a problem for Kevin Lowe-run teams, which frequently flitted about at 48 or 49 players under contract.

The second line in the sand is the 23-man limit.  An NHL team can't have more than 23 players on it's roster at any one time. 

Both of these lines have caused some confusion this summer.  Steve Tambellini has made comments about how bodies must go out if bodies are coming in.  Many fans have agreed, citing one of the above two reasons.  I really don't think that's a reasonable point of view to hold.

Star-divide

The 50-Man Limit

According to CapGeek.com (an increasingly indispensable resource for people like me) the Oilers have a combined total of 47 players either under contract or as RFA's whose rights are held by the Oilers.  That list includes Josef Hrabal, who according to Guy Flaming has been bought out.  It also includes Toni Rajala and Jordan Eberle - players who will not be counted against the 50-man limit if they are returned to junior.

In other words, come this winter the Oilers are probably looking at having 44 NHL contracts - including recently signed AHL'ers like Dean Arsene and Matt Nickerson.  This limit clearly poses no problems - and if it did, these were problems created this summer.

The 23-Man Limit

This is a more plausible problem, although the Oilers have already sent away players (Ales Kotalik, Kyle Brodziak) without bringing in replacements.  Let's look at the presumptive roster.

Also needing to clear waivers is Rob Schremp.  It's probably worth noting that Quinn is against fighters with no other discernible talents

Where I'm going with this is probably obvious.  The only way that the Oilers can claim they have too many bodies to add a free agent or two is by arguing that Gilbert Brule, J-F Jacques, Steve MacIntyre, Robert Nilsson and Marc Pouliot are the stumbling blocks.  In other words: there isn't any reason (other than salary concerns) for the Oilers to pass on a free agent unless he's an inferior player to every one of the four guys listed above.

It also seems clear to me that at least one spot (MacIntyre) and more probably two (Nilsson) are easy to open if the right player came along - say a third line forward like Manny Malhotra or Radek Bonk - or even a better than average fourth liner/penalty-killer like Andy Hilbert.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Its funny I have always viewed the too many bodies comment as top 6 bodies. If you think about it Penner, Horcoff, Hemsky, Gagner, Cogliano, O’Sullivan and Nillson are all suited for top 6 play and with already 7 bodies and only 6 slots yes we have no room for anyone else.
Last year Cogs was bumped to the third line but I think his results would be much better in the top 6, so now do we bump 2 top 6 players to the 3rd or 4th line? That opens up too many potential issues in my eyes.
I can also see why they are hesitant to send Nillson to the minors. Lets say he clears waivers (which he probably would) and goes to Springfield and lights it up! A new attitude, a new desire and he is having his best year ever! No way he is going to clear waivers on the way back up so he no longer becomes an option for the Oilers no matter how good he plays or how badly they may need his help.
I can see them starting the year with Nillson on the team and half way through the year either trade or demote him (once the coaches know what they have).
So if you look at it in top 6 forwards, yes we have too many bodies.

by West Coast Oil on Aug 5, 2009 8:08 PM MDT reply actions  

So if you look at it in top 6 forwards, yes we have too many bodies.

So how does having too many top-six players stop the team from adding a third-line centre?

A posse ad esse.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and OilersNation.

by Jonathan Willis on Aug 6, 2009 8:26 AM MDT reply actions  

Well if we pick up someone like Bonk for cheap that would give us a 3rd line of Bonk, Moreau and I would assume Cogs and if not Cogs then Pisani.
In my opinion Cogs on the 4th line is a waste of talent and a detriment to his development. Perhaps Pisani on that line with PK time as well but once again is this the best use of a resource?
Not to mention this move would mean pushing one of the other players down to the minors and Im not certain if we have any 2way forwards we could move.
I agree that a good proven 3rd liner would help the team, I can also see why the Oilers wont get one unless they can move a contract. Unfortunately I think they are only willing to move a top 6 for a 1st line LW.

by West Coast Oil on Aug 6, 2009 11:51 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yah I agree with you Jonathan on the contracts.

And personally I’ve asked this question in my head: who would I rather see on this team next year, Robert Nilsson (who’s skillset is duplicated by a few other Oilers at a cheaper price) or Manny Malhotra who fills in a need.

I hate to single players out, but if there’s an obvious need, I’d like to see Tambellini do something about it rather than make excuses that really don’t hold water. Try to trade Nilsson, if that doesn’t work, send him to the AHL through waivers.. if he gets scooped up, mission accomplished.

by Racki on Aug 6, 2009 6:27 PM MDT reply actions  

“The only way that the Oilers can claim they have too many bodies to add a free agent or two is by arguing that Gilbert Brule, J-F Jacques, Steve MacIntyre, Robert Nilsson and Marc Pouliot are the stumbling blocks. In other words: there isn’t any reason (other than salary concerns) for the Oilers to pass on a free agent unless he’s an inferior player to every one of the four guys listed above.”

I think Brule and Jacques have a lot to offer Pat Quinn.

RT40 writes with An Oilers Refinery and is an avid hockey fan.

by raventalon40 on Aug 6, 2009 11:44 PM MDT reply actions  

Sure, and so do Nilsson and Pouliot. Assuming that all four are too valuable to move, does Steve MacIntyre contribute more than Manny Malhotra? Or more than Radek Bonk?

I think not.

A posse ad esse.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and OilersNation.

by Jonathan Willis on Aug 7, 2009 3:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

It’s probably worth noting that Quinn is against fighters with no other discernible talents.

Steve MacIntyre, you’re on notice.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)

by Doogie2K on Aug 7, 2009 12:54 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Calgary 54 25 22 7 57
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.9.2012 at 7:25 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-39, .571)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL