Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

An Amicus Brief In Support of Dustin Penner, Part II -- Power Play

Brief of The Copper & Blue as Amicus Ludus In Support of Dustin Penner for Playing on the First Line, Part 2.

Table of Contents

   1. Introduction
   2. Traditional Stats
   3. Power Play
   4. Microstats
   5. Conclusion
  

1.  Introduction
The Edmonton Oilers failed to make the playoffs for the third straight year in 2008-2009.  Craig MacTavish, an ineffective and overmatched coach for the entire season, unfairly used Dustin Penner as a scapegoat throughout the year.  Because MacTavish was outcoached by virtually the entire league, Penner was made to suffer, when in fact, he should have been on the first line for the entire season, playing with Shawn Horcoff and Ales Hemsky.  Three seperate sets of statistics confirm the above argument.

3.  Power Play
Power Play statistics have not traditionally been separated from even-strength statistics when analyzing a player. In recent years, more granularity in statistical tracking has allowed the ability to measure players' effectiveness on the power play specifically, against teammates and opponents alike.

Star-divide

Using traditional statistics, Dustin Penner has been the third most productive power play forward for the Edmonton Oilers over the last two seasons as evidenced  by the following chart:

Pptraditional_stats_medium

His numbers dipped from 22 points in 07-08 to 11 points in 08-09, or a fall off of 50%.  Penner is second on the team in games played over that span, so there is the possibility that he is not as productive as initially indicated, or that the 07-08 season is an aberration.  We can check Penner's productivity against the team's productivity by using microstats.  We can check the details around Penner's performance on the ice with a man advantage by breaking the numbers down into time on the ice per player.  In this case, the useful stat is Goals For On the Ice per 60 minutes played. 

Oilersppgfon6007-08_medium

In this case, we can see that even though Penner's traditional stats were down, Penner outpaced all other forwards for the Edmonton Oilers and the power play was most productive when he was on the ice.  The team was only 4% less effective with Penner on the ice in 08-09 as compared to 07-08. Comparing Penner's GFON/60 % change to the other power play regulars:

Oilerspp_chg0708_medium

Even though Nilsson and Cogliano have a marked improvement year-over-year, they still lag far behind Penner in this category.  Looking at PPGFON/60 as a % of Dustin Penner's production provides a more stunning view of Penner's importance to the Oiler's power play:

Ppgfon60_ofpenner_medium

 
Only Ales Hemsky gets the same numbers out of his time on the ice with a man advantage.  Sam Gagner is beginning to look like he should be the team's primary option at center.  The rest of the team lags far behind.

 

The Oilers shift towards a system oriented around a shot from the point is likely the reason for the fall in Penner's traditional numbers.  It might also explain why the team was most effective with Penner on the ice. David Staples, a writer for the Edmonton Journal's Cult Of Hockey blog, wrote a column on Penner's effectiveness on the power play. In it, he details why Penner is so effective:

This year, I've been keeping track of the times that players made good plays that were key to a goal being scored, but they weren't given an official assist for one reason of another. Most of these unofficial assists are handed out to players who make a hit that leads to the goal, or screen the goalie, or make an excellent early pass in the scoring sequence. Dustin Penner leads the Oilers in unofficial assists with 22. Almost all of these have been awarded for the immensely effective manner in which Penner screens the opposition goalie. When he's out there, planting his 6-foot, 4-inches, 245-pounds in front of the goalie, few forces in the hockey universe can move the guy, not even a Chris Pronger crosscheck. He puts on the goalie a total eclipse of the shooter, and that's why the Oilers powerplay has been so effective as a unit when he's on the ice. In fact, the unit has more success with him out there than with any other Oilers player, including Sheldon Souray and Ales Hemsky. No, Penner doesn't get many powerplay goals or assists, but his screening of the goalie is such an effective strategy it loosens things up for every other Oilers shooter. That's a fact.

Emphasis mine.

With a barrage of shots coming from the point, Penner's play in front created many of the scoring opportunities that the Oilers capitalized on.

in 07-08, the Oilers lost Sheldon Souray to injury.  The power play did not focus on shots by defensemen, rather it was a more distributed system amongst the forwards.  Dustin Penner produced 22 power play points and a GFON/60 of 7.13.  In 08-09, in a system where the puck was distributed to the defensemen, Penner's traditional production slumped, but the team was just as effective while he was on the ice due to his play low in the offensive zone.  The versatility shown by Dustin Penner in his ability to operate in both systems wasn't fully taken advantage of during the 08-09 season.  In fact, his power play time was reduced by 25%.  It was a significant mistake.  As evidenced by the numbers above, Dustin Penner should be a fixture on the primary power play unit.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting post. The absolute numbers aren’t great for Penner, but neither are the team numbers. This raises the question – is he really part of the answer?

I don’t see how Staples’ stuff has any value though. PPGF/hr does a perfectly good job of capturing that.

by RiversQ on Jul 15, 2009 10:05 AM MDT via mobile reply actions  

I think Staples’ stuff has value – it’s Oilers-specific to be sure but it confirms what PPGF/60 is saying and not everyone can look at PPGF/60 and say “oh hey, he must be creating a lot of goals by standing in front of the net”.

They should be able to, but it’s one more supporting thread that it doesn’t hurt to include.

A posse ad esse.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and OilersNation.

by Jonathan Willis on Jul 15, 2009 10:24 AM MDT up reply actions  

i agree with JW. Staples has done a really good work. And this work by the bishop of the Church of Kurri ;) supports his work with further analysis. And frankly many of us who watched the games with regularity could observe that PP worked much better with Penner as a part of it. I havent seem much analysis, but IMO he certainly did a better job than Cole.

by SumOil on Jul 16, 2009 12:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

Good stuff, Derek. I was baffled as to why Penner’s PP TOI was reduced by fully 25% per game this past season when the unit had its best success with the big man providing the heavy shade in front. This was apparent by eye (both years) and the stats back it up. I have no idea what the hell MacT was watching.

I find Staples’ “unofficial assists” add valuable context and supporting evidence of his contributions that don’t necessarily involve touching the puck . Staples’ analysis identifies numerous specific instances Penner had a direct influence on goals, rather than simply happening to be on the ice when the puck went in.

I (imperfectly) remember having this very discussion with a couple of the Staterati — in other words, people who should know better — who were pointing to boxcar numbers and saying Hemsky was driving the bus on the PP while Penner was having little effect, even though the PP was scoring at a higher rate with 27 on the ice than any other regular.

But Rivers is right that the team numbers aren’t great, so maybe they’re all part of the problem, Hemsky inluded.

by Bruce McCurdy on Jul 15, 2009 12:17 PM MDT reply actions  

Or....

….perhaps the problem is the now-unemployed individual who was behind the Oilers bench.

The Oil PP being mediocre-to-terrible is not a new problem; that unit has not been successful at any point during the Craig MacTavish era.

Blaming the players is one thing that some might be willing to do, but from what I saw, it was a poisoned system they were trying to work with. How does the saying go – you can’t make chicken salad out of chicken feathers?

I’m interested to see that if there’s a marked improvement this year (assumption is that Quinn & Renney put a new man-advantage strategy into place).

by HBomb on Jul 15, 2009 12:38 PM MDT reply actions  

New Strategy

I’m wondering if that will include Gagner over Horcoff.

Contributor to The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jul 15, 2009 1:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

Frankly, I dont think Gagner is ready to replace Horcoff on the 1st powerplay unit yet. Horcoff is the closest thing to a sniper we have going for us.

by SumOil on Jul 16, 2009 12:50 AM MDT up reply actions  

may be in the next 2 seasons. but not just yet

by SumOil on Jul 16, 2009 12:51 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 54 34 15 5 73
Colorado 56 28 25 3 59
Minnesota 54 25 21 8 58
Calgary 55 25 22 8 58
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.11.2012 at 6:02 AM MST)

22 - 28 - 5

Won 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (14-5, .737)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (18-7, .720)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-13, .552)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-14,.333)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-40, .565)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (38-36, .514)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL