Josh Harding for Nilsson?
Should the Oilers deal left-winger Robert Nilsson, or Rob Schremp and a second-round draft pick, to Minnesota to get Josh Harding, the Wild's young backup goalie? Harding is never going to play regularly with Minnesota. He's stuck behind Niklas Backstrom, but the Wild likely wants to retrieve Patrick O'Sullivan in any deal with the Oilers.
I don't know if Matheson's actually heard something indicating this is deal is being discussed between the two teams, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was. Obviously Minnesota has made its goaltending decision with Niklas Backstrom's extension, and several different Oilers' fans have mentioned Harding as a possibility.
I'd be fine seeing all of Nilsson, Schremp and a second-round pick going to Minnesota for Harding, and the Oilers have a bit of leverage here; because Harding's an RFA, they can always threaten to sign him to an offer sheet in the 2.5MM range; Minnesota wouldn't neccessarily want to match that, and the return would only be a second round pick if they didn't.
As for Patrick O'Sullivan, while the trade might be fair value for the Oilers, we've seen how little goaltenders have fetched on the trade market, and so that would likely be an overpay (and have a better chance of coming back to haunt them, too). If the Wild won't play ball on a spare parts offer (some combination of the above players or any of Pouliot, Brodziak, Staios, Brule, Potulny and Deslauriers) than the Oilers might be well-advised to try for a player like Jaroslav Halak or Ondrej Pavelec.
Let's assume thought that the Wild won't move Harding unless O'Sullivan is going the other way, and vow to match any offer sheet. Is that a trade that you'd make?
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
POS trade
If Minnesota is that anxious to reacquire O’Sullivan, ask for Harding and Clutterbuck.
http:www.oildroppings.blogspot.com
If I’ve learned anything from the School of Brownlee™ over at ON, it’s that a trusted media source such as Matheson probably throws something like this out if he’s heard from a source that he wants to protect.
I would trade Nilsson and Schremp for Harding but not O’Sullivan. Our dual ownership of Schremp and O’Sullivan is interesting as both players were regarded very similarly at some point in their career. O’Sullivan put the work in and became decent defensively through chippy stickwork. Schremp on the other hand…
The more I think about it though, the more I see Souray going to San Jose at the draft as a probable trade. Marleau straight across or for SJ’s first and a prospect?
Either scenario makes sense in my opinion because it affords us space under the cap either now or a year from now when Gagner and Cogliano will be re-upping for a combined cap hit anywhere from 6 to 8 million, subject to their performance next season.
1- I am not willing to trade any assets for goal tending. There are 29 UFA goalies this year including Fernandez, Khabibulan and Biron who have a better track record than Harding. As well as Anderson, Clemmonsen and Jason Labarbera who are in the same range of skill and less $$.
2- I am not convinced that Harding is the guy long term. His stats are inflated due to playing on a defensive Minnesota team and his regular season to playoff splits are not good.
Oops, I guess that was Jon Kerber who made the comment about San Jose’s first rounder. I’m still trying to get used to Jonathan’s new spiffy site.
As for Clutterbuck.. I doubt you could get him straight across for Sully.
Well if SJ doesn’t have their first I suppose that’s not a great deal then, haha.
I still see the Marleau straight across as making a fair bit of sense from both sides.
For SJ his value is lowered by virtue of him only having one more year before he likely leaves to free agency and there’s the ever-present concern that he cannot captain the team to victory, whatever that might mean.
Dealing Souray we capitalize on his value being at it’s peak, and we receive a good centre for the upcoming season. Marleau’s value for us isn’t necessarily hurt by him being an UFA in a season because of the possibility of the cap declining and us having to deal with increasing salaries for our RFAs.
























