Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Identifying The 19th-Best Team In Baseball

Josh Harding for Nilsson?

Should the Oilers deal left-winger Robert Nilsson, or Rob Schremp and a second-round draft pick, to Minnesota to get Josh Harding, the Wild's young backup goalie? Harding is never going to play regularly with Minnesota. He's stuck behind Niklas Backstrom, but the Wild likely wants to retrieve Patrick O'Sullivan in any deal with the Oilers.

- Jim Matheson, Edmonton Journal

I don't know if Matheson's actually heard something indicating this is deal is being discussed between the two teams, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was.  Obviously Minnesota has made its goaltending decision with Niklas Backstrom's extension, and several different Oilers' fans have mentioned Harding as a possibility.

I'd be fine seeing all of Nilsson, Schremp and a second-round pick going to Minnesota for Harding, and the Oilers have a bit of leverage here; because Harding's an RFA, they can always threaten to sign him to an offer sheet in the 2.5MM range; Minnesota wouldn't neccessarily want to match that, and the return would only be a second round pick if they didn't.

As for Patrick O'Sullivan, while the trade might be fair value for the Oilers, we've seen how little goaltenders have fetched on the trade market, and so that would likely be an overpay (and have a better chance of coming back to haunt them, too).  If the Wild won't play ball on a spare parts offer (some combination of the above players or any of Pouliot, Brodziak, Staios, Brule, Potulny and Deslauriers) than the Oilers might be well-advised to try for a player like Jaroslav Halak or Ondrej Pavelec.

Let's assume thought that the Wild won't move Harding unless O'Sullivan is going the other way, and vow to match any offer sheet.  Is that a trade that you'd make?

 

Poll
As Oilers' G.M., would you trade Patrick O'Sullivan to Minnesota for Josh Harding?
Yes
88 votes
No
342 votes

430 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

POS trade

If Minnesota is that anxious to reacquire O’Sullivan, ask for Harding and Clutterbuck.

http:www.oildroppings.blogspot.com

by Bruce McCurdy on May 31, 2009 1:22 PM MDT reply actions  

If I’ve learned anything from the School of Brownlee™ over at ON, it’s that a trusted media source such as Matheson probably throws something like this out if he’s heard from a source that he wants to protect.

I would trade Nilsson and Schremp for Harding but not O’Sullivan. Our dual ownership of Schremp and O’Sullivan is interesting as both players were regarded very similarly at some point in their career. O’Sullivan put the work in and became decent defensively through chippy stickwork. Schremp on the other hand…

The more I think about it though, the more I see Souray going to San Jose at the draft as a probable trade. Marleau straight across or for SJ’s first and a prospect?

Either scenario makes sense in my opinion because it affords us space under the cap either now or a year from now when Gagner and Cogliano will be re-upping for a combined cap hit anywhere from 6 to 8 million, subject to their performance next season.

by Jon Kerber on May 31, 2009 2:25 PM MDT reply actions  

No way, no how. Not without stuff coming back the other way.

by Derek Zona on May 31, 2009 7:44 PM MDT reply actions  

1- I am not willing to trade any assets for goal tending. There are 29 UFA goalies this year including Fernandez, Khabibulan and Biron who have a better track record than Harding. As well as Anderson, Clemmonsen and Jason Labarbera who are in the same range of skill and less $$.

2- I am not convinced that Harding is the guy long term. His stats are inflated due to playing on a defensive Minnesota team and his regular season to playoff splits are not good.

by Matt.N on Jun 1, 2009 6:50 AM MDT reply actions  

Bruce: San Jose doesn’t own a 1st – they sent it to Tampa in the Boyle deal.

Then Tampa sent it to the Sens and then the Sens sent it to the Islanders (haha).

by Traktor on Jun 1, 2009 10:52 AM MDT reply actions  

Oops, I guess that was Jon Kerber who made the comment about San Jose’s first rounder. I’m still trying to get used to Jonathan’s new spiffy site.

As for Clutterbuck.. I doubt you could get him straight across for Sully.

by Traktor on Jun 1, 2009 11:08 AM MDT reply actions  

Well if SJ doesn’t have their first I suppose that’s not a great deal then, haha.

I still see the Marleau straight across as making a fair bit of sense from both sides.

For SJ his value is lowered by virtue of him only having one more year before he likely leaves to free agency and there’s the ever-present concern that he cannot captain the team to victory, whatever that might mean.

Dealing Souray we capitalize on his value being at it’s peak, and we receive a good centre for the upcoming season. Marleau’s value for us isn’t necessarily hurt by him being an UFA in a season because of the possibility of the cap declining and us having to deal with increasing salaries for our RFAs.

by Jon Kerber on Jun 1, 2009 11:14 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dukeriver2_small
A Narrative Revisited: Hemsky 83

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ken Campbell Wants to Make You Angry
Small
Oilers Worst (Quiet) Trade Ever
Ovechkin1_small
How Ryan Smyth Stunted Magnus Paajarvi
2012-01-21-012338_small
Milan Kytnar Loaned To SM-liiga Club HPK Hämeenlinna
N512640129_624767_3878_small
Jay Feaster Revisited : How do the Oilers get back to competing?
Ovechkin1_small
Grading Tambellini (free agent signings)
Ovechkin1_small
Grading Steve Tambellini (Trades)
Mets002_small
Reaching out to The Copper & Blue: Community research project
N512640129_624767_3878_small
Now and Then: the more things change...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 52 32 15 5 69
Minnesota 52 25 19 8 58
Calgary 53 24 22 7 55
Colorado 54 26 25 3 55
Edmonton 53 21 27 5 47

(updated 2.7.2012 at 7:26 AM MST)

21 - 27 - 5

Lost 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (22-7, .759)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (11-6, .647)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-11, .593)
  6. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  7. Los Angeles Kings (9-9, .500)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (11-12, .478)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-14, .440)
  10. Edmonton Oilers (11-15, .423)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  12. Colorado Avalanche (8-13, .381)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-3, .875)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (13-13, .500)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. Ottawa Senators (10-12, .455)
  9. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-11, .389)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (7-14, .333)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-19, .321)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (50-38, .568)
  2. Northeast (49-38, .563)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (36-36, .500)
  5. Northwest (33-44, .429)
  6. Southeast (33-53, .384)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL