Pat Quinn Named Head Coach
The Edmonton Oilers have named their new head coach, and it will be Pat Quinn. They've also picked a new associate, Tom Renney, and of the three assistant coaches, it now appears that only Kelly Buchberger will remain behind the bench, while Charlie Huddy and Bill Moores may find employment elsewhere in the organization.
Some quick thoughts:
- Quinn's an old-school coach; line-matching is not one of his strong suits and while Craig MacTavish (like virtually every other NHL coach) preferred veterans Quinn has an even stronger bias in that direction. I think this is a poor choice, and not one suited to the current roster.
- Lowetide did a "Quinn in a Box" bit earlier in the month which can be found here.
- Tom Renney is a good coach, and I'd imagine he is the succession plan for whenever Quinn decides to leave (under his own power or otherwise). Lowetide has a pretty detailed piece on him here, and honestly I think he is a tremendous hire as an associate coach. He has a good reputation tactically and for his work with young players, and his powerplays have generally been effective. Of note: the Rangers under his watch were one of the more effective teams in the league at keeping the puck in the right end of the rink. His personality may be better suited for the associate role than the head coaching role.
- Renney is likely, for good and bad, the succession plan. For good because it's always nice to see a plan, but for bad because it isn't always so nice to be locked into a course of action, especially if other options become available.
- Further proof that the "old boy's club" isn't a phenomenon limited to the Oilers; Tambellini hired from outside the group but grabbed two coaches who he has a ton of history with. This is par for the course in the NHL and makes sense (how is Tambellini supposed to trust a stranger nearly as much), but I really would have liked some more candidates considered from outside his direct sphere of influence (Laviolette being one example).
- Apparently Scott Arniel wasn't being seriously considered.
- The choice of Buchberger over Huddy was expected, but still disappointing. I wonder if Huddy is being considered for the Springfield job.
On the whole, this probably wasn't the best available candidate, although I really like the hire of Renney as an associate. Steve MacIntyre should be happy today, and I suspect we're about to see a team that looks very similar to Quinn's Maple Leafs, except without a Curtis Joseph.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Line Matching and Veterans
I think Quinn’s aversion to line matching has been massively overhyped. During the regular season he was definitely not a big matchup guy as Lowetide’s post points out but, this is purely anecdotally without looking at the numbers, from the playoff games that I attended when he was coaching the Leafs I remember being stunned at the amount of changing on the fly he did in order to get the matchups he wanted.
Quinn also shepherded quite a few kids into the Leafs’ lineup. He did move towards veterans but I think that that was more of a function of dealing with the pre-lockout landscape where choosing experience over youth was much easier.
I think that Renney and Quinn complement each other and I am looking forward to seeing what Tambellini does to get Quinn his CuJo.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 26, 2009 6:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm actually turning a bit on this...
I like this experiment a little more with time, and Quinn did run a bunch of kids in Vancouver. Time will tell.
It's only my opinion, but it's right.
Writer for The Copper & Blue, OilersNation, and CanucksArmy.
by Jonathan Willis on May 26, 2009 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the whole, this probably wasn’t the best available candidate
Who was then? I would have been ok with either Quinn or Renney as the head coach. Ok, but not thrilled. They are both competent and professional, with a very good resume. Getting both of them is very good business IMO.
Would the people who don’t like this hire also be up in arms over hiring an inexperienced guy like Scott Arniel?
by Matt.N on May 27, 2009 5:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Arniel's "inexperience"
I love when that word gets tossed around. Arniel has eight years of coaching experience in the IHL, AHL and NHL levels; this is his third season as an AHL head coach.
I would have been just fine with Arniel.
It's only my opinion, but it's right.
Writer for The Copper & Blue, OilersNation, and CanucksArmy.
by Jonathan Willis on May 27, 2009 7:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arniel or Todd Richards would have been good hires. Having one of them under Quinn in the associates role would be even better. My point here is that the Oilers braintrust has made a really intelligent hiring by getting 2 very good coaches.
I get a little frustrated with the people already on the pessimism bandwagon. This market has a bad habit of negativety and scapegoating (Corey Cross, Dustin Penner, Shawn Horcoff, MacT etc). I beleive in critical thinking and questioning common wisdom, however, we as fans, need to lighten up and try to support the team. It seems like some fans (not pointing a finger at you JW) almost hate their team and revel in any failures.
by Matt.N on May 27, 2009 7:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Todd Richards is already earmarked for Minnesota. Fletcher Jr. is a buddy of his, if I remember correctly.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)
by Doogie2K on May 27, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

























