Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Austin Rivers' Buzzer Beater Finishes Off UNC

Oilers Chose Not To Offer Rookie Max To Omark?

Omark_medium
A couple of articles in Sweden today picked up on Kevin Prendergast's comments praising Linus Omark's performance at the IIHF World Championships, including the Norrbottons Kuriren, which had this to say:

Det har inte gått NHL-klubben Edmonton Oilers obemärkt förbi.

 Som tidigare i våras valde att inte erbjuda Linus Omark topplönen för rookies, 850.000 dollar, motsvarande 6,6 miljoner kronor i årslön.

That's the original text, which I ran through Google Translator, and it spat out this:

There have been NHL club Edmonton Oilers unnoticed.
 
As earlier in the spring chose not to offer Linus Unchecked top salary for Rookies, $ 850,000, equivalent to 6.6 million in annual salary.

(bolding mine)

The reason I point this out is that everything I've heard from Prendergast would seem to indicate that the debate was not about money, but rather about a guaranteed roster spot.  Now, it's possible that there's a translation error here, and it's also possible that this has cropped up somewhere before, but I certainly haven't seen it.

Thoughts?  I'm especially interested if the translation can be confirmed.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There were actually quite a few comments by Omark about they money differential. The one that stuck out was probably where he commented that the money was not even close and that he was insulted by the Oilers’ offer.

No comments on the Oilers’ offer was forthcoming from KP, but that’s probably keeping in line with club policy.

by Jon Kerber on May 14, 2009 9:53 AM MDT reply actions  

Actually that second comment about KP is not correct now that I think a bit further. KP did comment in a later interview that they had sent a second offer to Omark’s European agent but apparently he had already signed the KHL contract. There was supposedly time pressure from the KHL team to sign right away.

by Jon Kerber on May 14, 2009 11:17 AM MDT reply actions  

Yeah, I remember something like what Jon Kerber is saying there. It sounded like KP lowballed them a bit to start, and came back with a better offer that didn’t get passed on prior to the KHL deal being signed. My understanding of things was that the new deal was better monetarily, but still didn’t include any promises about playing in the NHL rather than the A this year.

As an aside, am I the only one who finds it kinda funny that a slick offensive forward’s last name translates as Unchecked? Not quite as good as Uncheckable, but still.

by MattM on May 14, 2009 11:48 AM MDT reply actions  

Better than “can’t check his hat.”

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)

by Doogie2K on May 14, 2009 12:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's why Nilsson went to watch him...

“Hey look – here’s a young Swedish player that nobody is following – he’s even changed his name ot “Unchecked” in protest!"

It's only my opinion, but it's right.

Writer for The Copper & Blue, OilersNation, and CanucksArmy.

by Jonathan Willis on May 14, 2009 2:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Calgary 54 25 22 7 57
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.9.2012 at 7:25 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-39, .571)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL