Faith and Sample Size
At every single Olympics, World Championships, or World Junior tournament, it seems like ther's a goaltender from some tiny country who comes up huge. Belarus and Slovenia likely come to mind, but Latvia's done it a time or two as well. It used to be that Arturs Irbe was the goaltender who did it (although unlike most of them he was quite a decent NHL netminder too), but it's a different Latvian goaltender this year.
Edgars Masalskis (pictured) is not a familiar name in North America (despite this very cool unofficial website), but he's the goaltender helping to propel his country of just over 2,000,000 people through this year's IIHF world championships. Latvia's played four good games, losing 4-2 to the US before beating Sweden (3-2), Austria (2-0) and Switzerland (2-1). Masalskis has played in all four games, posting great numbers:
- Masalskis: 3-1, 1.68 GAA, .949 SV%, 1 SO
The Latvians feature a handful of NHL or ex-NHL role players (Karlis Skrastins, Martin Karsums, Janis Sprukts, Herb Vasiljevs) but they wouldn't be playing competitive games against Sweden, Switzerland and the United States without outstanding goaltending from Masalskis. He's done it before, too; last year he posted a .910 SV% at the World Championships and he's had previous moments of triumph.
However, he really isn't that good of a goaltender in the grand scheme of things; he put up lousy numbers in the DEL (Germany's top league) this past season and has bounced around the Belarus League, the Oberliga, the 1.liga, the Extraliga, the Latvian League and the East European League over the past five years. Twice now he's put up great numbers for his country at the World Championships, though.
It just happens, and I think the hockey community as a whole needs to start putting less stock in tests like the World Championships that are so brief; the World Juniors, the Olympics, and perhaps most pivotally: single playoff rounds.
0 recs |
1 comment
|
Comments
Re: Sample Size
One of the things that makes Hockey difficult to sell in new markets is the lack of emphasis on the single game. I grew up in Canada and would be happy if we had hockey to watch/play all year round, but, after living in a non-hockey state for a decade I am starting to realize why people have a hard time following it. There is just so much of it. Look how sucsessful the NFL hasbeen at sellings its product. the TV ratings are off the charts… why? because they play less than 20 games a season. Did you know that in that ESPN and ESPN II would rather air tenis, golf, swiming, bowling, or poker than hockey?
I know that in Canada, and select other markets, their is demad for this much hockey. But it is not universal. If we want to evaluate players in a way that will grow the game I think that more emphasis on single games will be key.
























