Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

A look at Linus Omark



Linus Omark

#67 / LW / Dynamo Moskva

5-9

185

Feb 05, 1987

 


Back in 2007 Edmonton made what in my mind could become one of the biggest steals of the NHL draft in recent years when they selected Linus Omark in the 4th round. At the time he was in his first full season of the Swedish Elite League, two years later he had scored 55pts in 53 games for Luleå and had become an internet sensation thanks to this:

 

Star-divide

Most people had hoped that Omark would take the leap over the pond in time for this season, but Omark chose Dynamo Moskva of the KHL and a chance to play with his childhood buddy Johan Harju (not to mention quite a lot of money), instead of the buses of the AHL. Omark has stated that he's not interested at all in playing for an AHL team, however his dream is to play in the NHL.

After a rough start, with rumours of him wanting to go home, things started to pick up after Dynamo changed their coach and right now he's the team leader in scoring and is posting these numbers:


GPGAP+/-PIMPPGSHGGWGTOI/GSOGPCT
2009 - Linus Omark 35 15 9 24 -2 20 4 0 4 16.06 70 21.4

 

He's been on a roll as of late scoring in 4 straight games and just tearing it up. He's also been involved in a mini-feud with former Luleå teammate Branko Radivojevic which Derek covered last week. One thing you can say about Omark is that he always finds ways to entertain you; be it with his stick, his skills or his (big) mouth.

As you can see from the Youtube clip he really is a flashy, creative and extremely skilled player, he looks to do things that really aren't suppose to work at this level and actually makes them happen. Linus has got a good nose for the goal, and is a natural scorer, he really has great offensive awareness and is good at finding his teammates with the pass. Sure he is lacking in size, but makes up for it with great balance, skill and he is deceptively good at holding onto the puck both in the open ice and along the boards.

That being said, he probably needs to hit the gym pretty hard if he really is going to succeed in the NHL, and Omark also needs to work on his skating, while definitively above average it could stand to be a bit more explosive, All in all, his preparations for the NHL will be quite a delicate balance.

Defensively he's improving, his great hockey-sense tends to bail him out, but he needs work in this area. Added strength will benefit him in this area as well.

So when will we see Omark in Edmonton? My guess is next season as long as we move some of the current smurfs, AND this is the big one.....

Edmonton gives him a one way deal, I don't think there is any chance of Omark playing in Springfield, he's made it quite clear that minor league hockey does not interest him. Now one can argue if Omark has shown enough to warrant a deal like that, there is quite a bit of difference between playing in relatively soft leagues like the SEL or the KHL and the more physical NHL, especially for someone as small of stature as Omark. But for my money I'd love to have him on the Oilers, he's a proven scorer in two different leagues and on the national team plus he's one of the most entertaining players around, just make sure he's not your first option for defense on that line.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Johan – what current NHL player does he compare to?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Dec 14, 2009 10:46 AM MST reply actions  

All I read there was “he’s the illegitimate son of Rob Schremp and Alexei Mikhnov.”

What do you suppose is the diminutive version of “Traktor Boy”?

by Benjamin Massey on Dec 14, 2009 10:55 AM MST reply actions  

“Riding lawnmower kid”

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Dec 14, 2009 11:01 AM MST up reply actions  

I’m not saying he’s as good, but I see some Ilya Kovalchuk

by JohanBarrander on Dec 14, 2009 11:23 AM MST reply actions  

And I don’t mean the whole showing up your opponent (even though that’s there too). As mentioned he’s no way there yet and he’s smaller. But I think they’re both hard to take the puck from and both are natural scorers.

by JohanBarrander on Dec 14, 2009 11:30 AM MST reply actions  

Omark seems like the second coming of Forsberg IMO other then the fact that hes not a physical and hes smaller

by battlegoon on Dec 15, 2009 1:42 PM MST reply actions  

Bearing in mind that size and physical play were the only reasons Forsberg wasn’t Alex Tanguay…

(note: I would totally take it if Omark was Alex Tanguay.)

by Benjamin Massey on Dec 15, 2009 9:15 PM MST up reply actions  

No, he’s a Swede, so you’re only allowed to compare him to other Swedes. Says so right here on Page 1 of the MSM Manual.

Kristian Huselius maybe?

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

by Bruce McCurdy on Dec 16, 2009 1:10 AM MST up reply actions  

Omark

How about a guy who is scoring at a 1.1 PPG pace in his first year in the KHL, has 15 more points than Omark and is a bigger smurf – Patrick Thoresen. Would you add Thoresen over Omark?

by Stuartvan on Dec 16, 2009 3:59 PM MST reply actions  

Mjolnir is also three and a half years older than Omark (boo) and a much much much better defensive player (yay).

I’d argue that Omark is ahead of Thoresen’s career curve, not that that’s saying a lot.

by Benjamin Massey on Dec 16, 2009 7:14 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 54 34 15 5 73
Minnesota 54 25 21 8 58
Calgary 55 25 22 8 58
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.10.2012 at 1:26 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-39, .571)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL