Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

Patrick O'Sullivan: Value for money?

There was a lot of excitement in Oilerville last March 4 when Steve Tambellini made his first significant deals, sending soon-to-be-UFA Erik Cole back to Carolina in a three-way trade that landed Patrick O'Sullivan from Los Angeles. The swap also involved a favourable exchange of draft picks (a 5th-rounder for a 2nd), and Tambellini quickly used the latter to acquire another impending UFA, Ales Kotalik, from Buffalo for the stretch drive.

The best part of the deal according to many was that while Cole was surely going elsewhere at season's end, O'Sullivan (whom I will hereafter refer by his rather unfortunate acronym POS) was locked up for two more years. That's a great return for an expiring contract, what?

Well, yes and no. A player and his contract represent both an asset and a liability, and that is especially true in the salary cap era where more than ever the equation is Salary = Expectations.

In the case of POS, he had a strong season in the last year of his entry level contract (80 GP, 22-31-53, -8) and cashed in with a three-year extension at an annual cap hit of $2.925 MM. He arrived in Edmonton less than one year into that deal, with a reputation as an exciting and versatile young player known to be a shooter, something everyone agreed the Oilers needed. Indeed he had already fired 200 shots on the season, and while just 14 of those had found twine (Sh% 7.0%) surely he just had to keep firing and the goals would come.

Well, he has kept firing, and the goals have not come. Just 2 goals on 59 shots over the last 19 games of '08-09, and just 2 goals on 44 shots in the first 15 games of '09-10, leaving him with a severely unimpressive Sh% of just 3.9% as an Oiler.  He may be a shooter, but there's not much evidence to say he's a scorer, and even less that he's a positive difference-maker (34 GP, 4-10-14, -10 as an Oiler). Now nearly halfway into that 3-year contract, his production level has stagnated, suggesting that his fine '07-08 season may have had more to do with linemate Anze Kopitar driving results than POS himself. 

There is much to like about the player. He's still young. He skates well. He can play all three forward positions and both special teams (if not particularly effectively to this point). My bigger concern is about asset management and roster building. That contract ranks a solid fourth among Oiler forwards behind the big three of Horcoff, Penner and Hemsky. Surely he should be a driving force behind secondary scoring? And surely he should bring things to the table to complement rather than replicate the skill set of the team? These questions are not so much of the player as of management. What kind of team is Steve Tambellini trying to build here?  

Star-divide

By committing to Patrick O'Sullivan last March, Tambellini effectively limited both his cap space and his options for the free agent market last summer. $2.925 MM is a lot of scratch that could land a very good player, or two or even three pretty decent ones. For example Calgary pays $2.55 MM combined for Curtis Glencross and Rene Bourque and gave up next to nothing in the way of assets for either. Rather than cherrypick though, I will simply compare the three guys involved in the dealings of March 4.

As I see it the Oilers have been a seriously unbalanced team for a while. The team has a severe shortage of prime-of-career players, with just three players -- Horcoff, Comrie, MacIntyre -- between the ages of 28 and 32. Moreover, they lack size up front, particularly among the so-called skill players in the top 6. Yet Tambellini gave up Cole (and any realistic chance to resign him) for POS; and while Kotalik was a nice temporary fix, there was no money in the pot to re-sign him over the summer. All wound up signing for very similar money. Which guy might best have suited Oilers needs?

1) Vital statistics:

POS: Age 24, 5'11, 190, cap hit $2.925 MM through 2010-11 
Cole: Age 31, 6'2, 205, cap hit $2.9 MM through 2010-11
Kotalik: Age 31, 6'1, 227, cap hit $3.0 MM through 2011-12

2) Ice time (crude average since March 4 weighting both partial seasons equally):

POS: 18.4 M/G (1.6 PK, 2.8 PP)
Cole: 19.3 M/G (2.2 PK, 3.3 PP)
Kotalik: 15.3 M/G (0 PK, 3.0 PP)

3) Performance (since 2009 March 4):

POS: 34 GP, 4-10-14, -10, 0.41 P/G
Cole: 20 GP, 2-13-15, even, 0.75 P/G
Kotalik: 34 GP, 12-11-23, -2, 0.68 P/G

1) is perhaps most damning. Cole and Kotalik are both mature players who bring significant size and aggressive play into a skill role. Aggressiveness can be measured to some extent by Hits, an unreliable metric which nonetheless contains important truths when the discrepancies are extreme as these: Cole 58 (2.9/G); Kotalik 53 (1.6/G); POS 14 (0.4/G). O'Sullivan is best classified as a smurf, and his 8 hits in '09-10 place him in the middle of a pack that includes Cogliano (11), Penner (11) Gagner (6), Horcoff (6), Nilsson (6), Comrie (5), Hemsky (3), which is to say every single skill forward on the team. (Penner isn't a smurf obviously, but he's not ultra-aggressive either.) The only consistent hitters are Jacques, Stortini, Brule, Moreau, Stone, and there's not a legitimate top-6er in the group. This was an imbalance on the team last year even with Cole or Kotalik, and rather than be addressed it has become more polarized than ever. It's a sad fact that Erik Cole has more hits (12) in just 3 games before being injured, than any Oiler "skill" forward has 15 games in.

2) POS holds his own in ice time, whether his actual play has warranted it or not. He brings one important skill that Kotalik does not (penalty-killing), which is a plus for a team that was desperate for decent PK guys. He also has more flexibility than either vet, as Kotalik is strictly a winger and Cole strictly a Right winger. POS can play in the middle as well ... unfortunately he is nothing close to a faceoff ace, winning just 42 of 110 sorties on the dot for a Coglianoesque 38.2% success rate.

3) POS is a distant third to the other guys in both points production and plus/minus. To this point he's just not getting it done as an offensive or as a two-way player. 

As for bringing balance to the Oilers, the PK seems to be his major edge over the other smurfs. That said there's lots of PK guys out there for half or a third or even a quarter of $2.925 MM. I would consider his versatility a plus if he were actually producing at any one of the three positions, but based on his career as an Oiler to this point he might as well be Marc Pouliot or Liam Reddox flitting from line to line, filling in where needed. Or even Toby Petersen for goodness sakes. $2.925 MM is a lot of scratch for a utility infielder.

I'm not rooting against the young man, but he needs to bring more to the plate, and quickly, to justify the organization's faith and dollars. Perhaps he's the guy who will be given the chance to step up if Horcoff is down for any length of time ... for sure he needs to step it up somewhere. Steve Tambellini's reputation is at stake. :)

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree, Mr. McCurdy! (Kind of . . . .)

Bruce,
I agree that POS has been a disappointment, a major one, as he should be experienced enough to be heading into his best years as a player.

You’re also right that it was bad to let go two big guys, and keep another Smurf.

My two issues are that a) Kotalik was never much as a hitter that I could see (unlike Cole, a real bruiser) and that I don’t like to see OK vets signed up at age 31 to long-term deals, as they’re definitely heading out of their best years, and are far more likely to be injured, especially a physical player like Cole.

So, to me, O’Sullivan was a better bet than Cole or Kotalik, in that he was heading into his peak years, not out of them. But he was a worse bet in that he was not physical, and, most of all, it looks now as if Kopitar really did drive the bus on the good things that happened for him.

Like you, I’m cheering for the kid, and hoping he can turn into some kind of latter day Ron Ellis, but he’s got to increase his grit/work rate.

by David Staples @ The Cult of Hockey on Nov 4, 2009 2:33 PM MST reply actions  

Thanks David. On a player to player basis I don’t disagree. POS may well be a better bet than either Cole or Kotalik, both of whom also displayed a few warts during their time here. The org. looked at all three of them and POS was the one they chose (although POS over Kotalik was cast in stone the day of the trades due to their contract status). My point is that you can’t keep making the same decisions in the same directions with the same bias time after time. The team was already flush with youngish, smallish, softish forwards in Hemsky, Nilsson, Pouliot, Brodziak, Gagner, Cogliano, with Reddox, Potulny and Schremp knocking on the door and Omark and Eberle waiting in the wings. How many of these guys is enough? For his salary POS needed/needs to be a significant upgrade on some of these guys, and all I’m seeing is flashes.
 
For sure he’s a significant downgrade on Cole, who among other things led the Oilers in hits in ’08-09 despite leaving the team on March 4(134, more than twice as many as any of the above named smurfs) ; was top 5 in the NHL in penalties drawn; was top 20 among regular penalty-killers in the NHL in goal differential/60; and who need I mention scored on considerably more than 4% of his shots even in a disappointing offensive year. (11% as an Oiler) Lest we also forget, the Oilers fell from a playoff position down the stretch as POS slumped and Cole was nowhere to be seen.

These last two weeks we been watching the same movie, and when we have needed a big hit to get the other guys on their heels, to draw a powerplay or better yet score an actual Goal, we’re not getting them from POS or any of the other smurfs for that matter, and what veterans we do have have hands of stone and bodies of glass. I agree with you about long-term deals to the over-30 crowd … so far Oilers have given them to Moreau, Pisani, Horcoff, Souray, Visnovsky, and tell me how well that’s been working out. Two of three of them hurt at all times, seemingly (and I’m still waiting for the other shoe to drop on Khabibulin shudders. But I don’t mind a judicious one- or two-year deal with a guy at the height of his maturity, simply because we hardly have any guys like that.

Ultimately my plaint is the same as Lowetide’s all these non-playoff years — we need Balance.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 4, 2009 6:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Two of or three of them hurt at all times

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 4, 2009 7:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Regarding his best season in L.A. being a functin of Kopitar:

He didn’t spend the whole year with Brown/Kopitar. He was put with them in December after playing with rubbish for the first two months of the year (Handzus, Calder, Willsie, Moulson, Armstrong…). In late Feb and early Mar he then played on a line with Frolov/Cammalleri before finishing the year cycling between Brown/Kopitar and Frolov/Extra.

This should give us some interesting splits:

Oct/Nov (mostly with scrubs) – 8 points in 24 games
Dec-Feb (mostly with Kopitar/Brown) – 32 points in 41 games
Mar-Apr (mostly with good players, not always Kopitar/Brown) – 13 points in 17 games

From this I information I think it’s fair to conclude that with good players O’Sullivan will produce good results, whether it’s Kopitar or someone else. With poor players, O’Sullivan is not good enough to carry the line and his numbers suffer. I’d be interested to see what O’Sullivan could do with an extended audition (say at least 10 games) with Horcoff and Hemsky. If it works, it allows Penner to move down the lineup and brings us some balance.

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 4, 2009 3:19 PM MST reply actions  

O’Sullivan is not good enough to carry the line and his numbers suffer

Agreed, and I think if he had half-way decent teammates he would be fine. I think that we’ve also got to remember that he’s being cursed by playing three different positions on two different lines with new linemates every other game. Consistency of position and linemates would probably drive a bit more consistent play out of O’Sullivan.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 4, 2009 5:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks for digging, Scott, I knew I was oversimplifying with Kopitar comment (and didn’t even mention Brown). Frolov and Cammalleri aren’t garbage either, and three of the four of them are big guys which probably didn’t hurt Patio’s cause. They’re probably all four better players than the guys POS has been playing with here.

I think if he had half-way decent teammates he would be fine.

Unfortunately, Hemsky has permanent dibs on the best linemates, and Oilers don’t have anything close to a Frolov or a Brown to stock a second line. That said, I wouldn’t mind seeing POS get the shot between Hemsky and Penner during the next “7-10 days”; if the guy can play centre this would be a real good time to find out. I’m all in favour for giving him chances and responsibilities to get the best out of him; so far, however, nothing has seemed to light his fire.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 4, 2009 7:20 PM MST up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure that it’s a better bet to run O’Sullivan out at center than it is to run Cogliano out there. Man, this team really needs a center.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 4, 2009 7:23 PM MST up reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

Lanterns has been getting light treatment from the Oilogosphere since he arrived. Meanwhile people howl (mostly rightly, but still) about what Moreau and Pisani and Nilsson and Staios are making. All less than Senor Furniture, who produces nothing yet seems to get a free ride.

With every passing game it becomes more clear that the Cole etc. move was a very clever salary dump by Dean Lombardi. He realised he got pressured into an unwise overpay for Patio and was smart enough to get out from under it when he got the chance. Another muffin for Oil management. They must be laughingstocks by now.

by Chateau la Puck on Nov 4, 2009 3:29 PM MST reply actions  

It definitely wasn’t a straight salary dump for L.A. since they added about 0.6M in the transaction. Rather, it seems that Lombardi thought that Justin Williams was a significant upgrade on Patrick O’Sullivan, i.e., the extra performance from Williams was worth more than 0.6M (they were signed for the same term). Personally, I’m not convinced that was the best bet given Williams’ injury history.

I agree that O’Sullivan probably deserves more criticism than he’s getting though. At almost 3M you need to be the kind of player who can be a catalyst with less skilled men. That doesn’t mean he should be able to make every combination work but so far he hasn’t been able to really get any combination going.

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 4, 2009 6:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Good work Scott

Scott, you’re making some fair points about Patrick O’Sullivan. I’ll try to be a bit more patient here. . .. . But, all that said, it’s not like he’s been put out with Ethan Moreau on the Oilers. He hasn’t played with stars, but he’s had OK linemates . .. .

by David Staples @ The Cult of Hockey on Nov 5, 2009 2:38 PM MST reply actions  

But not consistent linemates. It means alot, I believe. I’m sure Gabe will be along to disprove that with numbers.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 5, 2009 6:39 PM MST up reply actions  

I’m not convinced he’s had anything approaching the quality of Brown, Kopitar, Cammalleri or Frolov on a consistent basis. When he’s been with Penner he’s looked pretty good. I think he’d look fine with Hemmer too. Ideally he’d be “the man” for two more marginal players and make a group like Cogs and Jacques hum but it seems he’s just not good enough.

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 5, 2009 8:28 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 52 32 15 5 69
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Colorado 54 26 25 3 55
Calgary 52 24 22 6 54
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.4.2012 at 4:07 PM MST)

20 - 26 - 5

Won 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (22-7, .759)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (11-6, .647)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-11, .593)
  6. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  7. Los Angeles Kings (9-9, .500)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (11-12, .478)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-14, .440)
  10. Edmonton Oilers (11-14, .440)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  12. Colorado Avalanche (8-13, .381)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (20-3, .870)
  2. New York Rangers (17-8, .680)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-8, .667)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-9, .609)
  5. Washington Capitals (12-12, .500)
  6. Toronto Maple Leafs (12-12, .500)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (10-10, .500)
  8. Ottawa Senators (10-11, .476)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (10-13, .435)
  10. Florida Panthers (7-10, .412)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. New Jersey Devils (8-12, .400)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (7-14, .333)
  14. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (8-19, .296)

Division Standings

  1. Central (50-38, .568)
  2. Northeast (46-37, .554)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (36-36, .500)
  5. Northwest (33-43, .434)
  6. Southeast (32-51, .386)

The Oilers Top 25 Under 25


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL