Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

The Art Of The Deal, Lessons for Kevin Lowe

 

To win a negotiation you have to show you're willing to walk away. And the best way to show you're willing to walk away... is to walk away.

----Michael Westen, Burn Notice

Star-divide

Edmonton_oilers_v_dbc7_medium


On June 29th, 2008, Kevin Lowe sent Jarret Stoll and Matt Greene to Los Angeles for Lubomir Visnovsky.  It was a trade that Lowe won hands-down.  In the time before and the time since, it's been so rare that Edmonton wins a deal that some people are already starting to forget -- January 26th, 2006.  On that day, Kevin Lowe was on top of his game, sending Jani Rita and Cory Cross to Pittsburgh for Dick Tarnstrom.  He landed Jaroslav Spacek for the low, low price of Tony Salmelainen.  The day was a coup for the Oilers and at the time was a continuation of Lowe's personnel mastery.  To begin that same season, on August 3rd, 2005, Kevin Lowe fleeced a desperate Larry Pleau and sent out Eric Brewer, Jeff Woywitka and Doug Lynch and brought Chris Pronger to Alberta.  Lowe also won another deal that day, though it's not mentioned as often, sending Mike York and a conditional pick to the Islanders for Michael Peca

Fast forward nearly four years.  Chris Pronger publicly demanded a trade and Lowe, thinking he was handcuffed, sent out Pronger for a wheelbarrow full of unproven pieces and picks.  Ryan Smyth and EIG decided to butt heads over $100,000 per year, and a seemingly shocked Lowe sent Smyth away for more unproven pieces and picks.

Lowe has also struggled in free agency negotiations.  Since the Edmonton trip to the Stanley Cup Finals, he's overpaid the people willing to sign with the Oilers.  Those who weren't willing have been chased all over the continent by Lowe and his bags of money.  Fernando Pisani landed a $2.5 million per year deal following his career-best performance in the playoffs.  Ethan Moreau, a third line grinder when on his game, landed a four year contract worth $2 million per year in the months following the cup run.  Steve Staios, 33 at the time, signed a four year contract for $2.7 million per year shortly thereafter.  Lowe dropped $7.2 million per year on three players, all on the wrong side of 30, all coming off career-best performances.  He was worse in the unrestricted market, though.

Like a drunken sailor in port, Kevin Lowe spends the off-season looking for ways to hang cap-killing, long-term contracts on the Oilers.  He unsuccessfully offered Marian Hossa $90 million dollars over 10 years.  He unsuccessfully courted Jaromir Jagr with a rumored offer of $7 million per year.  He successfully landed Sheldon Souray for $5.4 million a year over five years - during a negotiation in which he was the only person bidding on Souray's services.  He offered Dustin Penner, Andrew Cogliano and Ladislav Smid for Dany Heatley, and then flew all over western Canada and went to Heatley, prostrate, to beg him to play for the Oilers.  

Since the end of the Cup finals, Lowe has won a single deal - the Visnovsky trade. 

What Lowe is unable to do is, as Michael advises above, walk away.  In the midst of a negotiation, the best negotiators set a walk-away point before talks even begin and adjust that walk-away point as the back-and-forth moves along.  The best negotiators can walk away well before that point is hit if they feel they can get the upper hand in the negotiations.  They are able to strong-arm those who are afraid they aren't getting a good deal, and they are able to scare those that are afraid of missing out completely.  Kevin Lowe falls into the last category.  He's so afraid of coming away empty-handed that he's willing to jump at the first deal that comes his way, and he's willing to overpay his targets just to make sure that he doesn't miss out.

Lowe would do well by eliminating himself from the negotiating process altogether.  He should surround himself with a shrewd negotiator or two and let them do the dirty work.  Let them take the blame if the process goes bad.  If he's unable to do so, the best thing that Kevin Lowe could do is to simply walk away from the table once.  Let the deal die.  Gain the upper-hand on a guy that is afraid of missing out.  It would be both a learning and cathartic experience for the guy that famously asked "Is it me?" in a press conference.  Even if it's a 50-50 chance that Lowe ends up with nothing, 50% of a winning deal is better than he's been able to do in the last three-and-a-half years.

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Disagree

No doubt Lowe’s FA record is awful. But only winning one deal is wrong.

Grebeshkov for MA Bergeron? Total win for Lowe
Brule for Torres? A deal that worked for both parties so also a win
Syvret for Potulny? Too early to tell but looking like a win
Lupul & Smith for Pitkanen? Win

Even the Penner signing is looking decent. Lowe stated flat out at the time of the signing that Penner needed to start out performing his contract in year 3 of the deal. Looking accurate.

by ahbrown42 on Nov 30, 2009 5:10 PM MST reply actions  

I’d agree with this assessment overall. Lowe has in fact made quite a few good or defensible moves in his post-Pronger career. Goodish moves might include those mentioned above (though I didn’t and don’t personally like the Torres-Brule swap) as well as picking up Jan Hejda for a 7th round pick and Curtis Glencross for Dick Tarnstrom. There are a lot of other transactions that were poor and the man didn’t really demonstrate a consistent plan after the Pronger deal, which was frustrating, but he did have some nice moments from time to time.

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 30, 2009 5:23 PM MST up reply actions  

Results-oriented thinking kills puppies

Each of the deals you mention looks good in hindsight but was bad or even at the time it was made.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 30, 2009 5:26 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

I’d argue that’s only true of the Brule deal (if you like it now). I thought the Syvret/Potulny deal was even and liked the other two. I also think the Hejda/7th deal and Glencross/Tarnstrom deal carried little to no risk with the potential for good reward. Solid deals. There are plenty of examples of bad or risky ones though.

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 30, 2009 5:55 PM MST up reply actions  

I don’t say that he wasn’t even. He had a couple of even deals here and there. But if the best you can do, as a GM, in the trade market and free agency market is “even”, there are going to be some big problems with your team.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 30, 2009 6:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Sure, but some of them are better than even. The Pitkanen deal looked like a pretty clear win at the time I thought. Maybe I just like Pitkanen more than most. The Hejda and Glencross deals are big wins for Lowe not because of what they turned into but because he assumed no risk and they had the potential to turn into something valuable. Those are probably his two best trades post-Pronger because there was virutally no downside.

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 30, 2009 6:28 PM MST up reply actions  

The Pitkanen deal looked like a pretty clear win at the time I thought. Maybe I just like Pitkanen more than mos

Nah – I love Pitkanen. But he was heavily damaged goods in Philly. It was a damaged goods swap, nothing more.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 30, 2009 7:01 PM MST up reply actions  

I dont think any of them were that bad, Except for the smyth deal he hasnt really last any deal ….hands down

by SumOil on Nov 30, 2009 8:18 PM MST up reply actions  

Seriously, we gave up a guy with.. personal problems.. that couldn’t score worth a damn for a guy formerly rated #2 behind Crosby. He was a reclamation project. Torres was overpaid for what he was bringing. I agree with ahbrown’s assessment. Those are good deals now, and in the past… so far. Lowe wasn’t bad at trading.. he was just horrible at contracts (free agents / re-signings) as of the new CBA.

Visit www.puttingonthefoil.com

by Racki on Nov 30, 2009 6:28 PM MST reply actions  

I just want to say, I fucking love Burn Notice.

Carry on.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Nov 30, 2009 9:59 PM MST reply actions  

I just want to say, I fucking love Burn Notice.

As do I. The writers are outstanding.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Dec 1, 2009 10:06 AM MST up reply actions  

one of the best shows on right now.
Michael Weston is the man

by SumOil on Dec 1, 2009 10:18 AM MST up reply actions  

Shouldn’t Tambellini get the blame for the Heatley farce?

by doritogrande on Nov 30, 2009 10:05 PM MST reply actions  

Shouldn’t Tambellini get the blame for the Heatley farce?

Throwing three players at Ottawa, flying to meet him in person, begging him to come to Edmonton, not letting go of the deal…you think that smacks of Mr. Dithers? That has Lowe written all over it.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Dec 1, 2009 10:12 AM MST up reply actions  

I hate to disagree Derek, but I’ve generally thought that Lowe’s sins were of omission rather than commission. Although on the other hand that may only be because none of his free agent pursuits were willing to take the suitcases of money he was offering.

A posse ad esse.

The Copper & Blue|OilersNation|Hockey or Die!

Twitter: @JonathanWillis
Mail: jonathan.willis@live.ca

by Jonathan Willis on Nov 30, 2009 10:16 PM MST reply actions  

One of those suitcases of money was a pretty good bet I thought. If Lowe would have succeeded in plucking Jagr at $7M for one or two seasons, I sure wouldn’t have been complaining. Jagr is a fantastic talent and the deal would have been short term and would have forced some other shoes to drop in terms of salary structure which would probably have helped the team longer term anyway. Assuming they tried to keep the top six forwards on the team, it would have been a nice group. If they split them into pairs, the team could have been pretty deep (say, Gagner-Jagr, Horcoff-Cole and Hemsky-Penner with Gagner-Jagr taking the most offensive situations and Horcoff-Cole getting stuck out in the defensive situations).

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 30, 2009 11:00 PM MST up reply actions  

and the deal would have been short term

Why would you think this? When have the OIlers ever offered anyone a short-term deal to give you a frame-of-reference like this?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Dec 1, 2009 10:07 AM MST up reply actions  

Because Jagr wouldn’t come to Edmonton based on the term of the deal. They would only offer him one year. I wish they would have offered him two but it’s been pretty well-documented that they would only give him one.

by Scott Reynolds on Dec 1, 2009 10:36 AM MST up reply actions  

Wow, a whole K-Lowe post and the names Nylander and Vanek never even came up. Unreal.

Funny thing is I’m still not sure I agree that we “won” the Visnovsky trade. I love Vis as a player, but he’s going to be pretty old before the Oil are any good, and the risk of that contract is fairly high. Meanwhile, the Oil are mighty shy on mid-career players, of which Stoll and Greene are (were) two. Moreover, L.A. has done nothing but improve since that trade, while Oilers have been treading water at best, so there’s not a whole lot there to suggest Oilers “won” the trade. I know, other factors are in play on both sides which serve to obfuscate things, so it’s hard to tell, I just don’t see it as a one-sided deal.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 30, 2009 11:02 PM MST reply actions  

Wow, a whole K-Lowe post and the names Nylander and Vanek never even came up. Unreal.

Damn. As I went back through the Oilers transaction history, I didn’t see those, so I completely neglected them.

Moreover, L.A. has done nothing but improve since that trade, while Oilers have been treading water at best,

Most of that has to do with the additions that Lombardi made, not Stoll and Greene. Stoll and Greene are role players that any competent general manager could have landed replacements for…you know, if they were competent.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Dec 1, 2009 10:09 AM MST up reply actions  

Aye, there’s the rub. In the ongoing game of Roster Whack-A-Mole, new holes were created in the filling in the “puck-moving defenceman” hole. Ironically we already had a couple of young puck-moving D, whereas since Stoll and Greene moved on the 3C hole never has been adequately filled, and the need for another stay-at-home, physical defender is also still being felt IMO.

My bigger concerns about the deal have to do with the ages and contracts of the protagonists.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

by Bruce McCurdy on Dec 1, 2009 10:20 AM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 54 34 15 5 73
Colorado 56 28 25 3 59
Minnesota 54 25 21 8 58
Calgary 55 25 22 8 58
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.11.2012 at 6:02 AM MST)

22 - 28 - 5

Won 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (14-5, .737)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (18-7, .720)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-13, .552)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-14,.333)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-40, .565)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (38-36, .514)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL