Edmonton - Los Angeles post-mortem: frustration
It's a hopeless feeling when it's still bloody November and you're already resigned to your team being out of contention. But that's exactly how I feel right now. Frustrated.
Another night, another winnable game lost in regulation, another key player sidelined with injury. For at least the third time this year we saw an Oiler leave a game after being sent head first into the boards on a hit from behind. This time it was none other than Ales Hemsky, not only a key to Edmonton's offence but a key to making Oiler games fit to watch. This one certainly wasn't after Ales was helped off, a victim of Michal Handzus's cheap and dangerous crosscheck that catapulted him into the end boards. For which, predictably, Handzus was given a 2-minute slap on the wrist, returning to play a key role on the game-winning goal. Meanwhile, in Washington Alex Ovechkin was given 5 minutes for a much less dangerous hit on agitator Patrick Kaleta, who never missed a shift. But if it's an Oiler who is showing his numbers, it's open season out there. Frustrating.
It also hurt to see Matt Greene cap a splendid game by scoring the winning goal in the dying minutes. Greene became the third recent ex-Oiler to score a game-winner in Rexall in this calendar year, joining Raffi Torres and Marty Reasoner who also scored late tie-breaking goals to send the faithful grumbling into the night. If those bums had scored while they were here they might never have been traded in the first place. Greene was all over the scoresheet with 6 attempted shots, 4 hits, 5 blocked shots, +2, and of course that game winning goal. He was a much greater force in this game than Lubomir Visnovsky, the guy Oilers traded Greene AND Jarret Stoll to obtain. Frustrating.
Worse was that the winner came in regulation time in a game both teams seemed to be nursing to OT. But in a few seconds what was left of the first line lost their composure and their shape in Oilers' end, with all 5 guys being sucked over to Wayne Simmonds' side of the ice opening the door for Greene to walk in and blast the best shot of his Rexall Place career. So the Oilers came away with nothing, dropping a point to conference rivals Minnesota, Colorado, and St.Louis, all of whom were rewarded for managing to "lose" their games in extra time. Frustrating.
Oilers were once again dominated on the shot clock, allowing double digits in each period while never managing more than 8 shots themselves for a final margin of 35-23. It was another tough night for Liam Reddox, outshot 7-0 in his 7:18 at even strength with another atrocious Corsi of -10. In the last 3 games Reddox has been on the ice for just 7 attempted shots by the Oilers and a staggering 46 by the bad guys. After his recall Reddox showed just enough to make me care about him, but has not resembled an NHL player of late. Frustrating.
Jeff Deslauriers played moderately well, making many fine stops among his 33 saves but undoing his work by absolutely seiving in a long slider from Simmonds which tied the score in the second, then getting beat clean by Matt Greene of all people with the game on the line. Frustrating.
So now Oilers are 4/5 of the way through the home stand with an uninspiring 2-2-0 record, a tilt against the powerful Sharks looming. It's been five long weeks, 16 games and counting since the last time the squad won 2 in a row. Did I mention I'm getting frustrated?
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m STILL seething over that hit.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
So am I
I’ve watched several replays of Alex Ovechkin getting the heaveho for hitting notorious agitator and diver Patrick Kaleta shoulder to shoulder: that’s 5 minutes. But crosschecking Ales Hemsky facefirst into the end boards and knocking him out of the game is 2 minutes in Gary Bettman’s NHL. I’m sure people in both rinks were happy to see Ovy and Hemsky out of their respective games while those major attractions Kaleta and Handzus stuck around to the finish.
I’m tired of open season on Oilers. Somebody on our team needs to go apeshit on the next guy who cheap shots a teammate. I know that’s stupid-talk, but it’s gotten to the point where the Oilers need to defend themselves a little more aggressively. The refs and the league are going to do nothing, that’s been proven.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 26, 2009 12:29 AM MST up reply actions
I don’t think it’s a concussion. Check this out.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Why can’t it be both things!
As for the stupid-talk, a physical response is somewhat necessary, even just from a “we have one another’s backs” perspective so that all of the guys know they care about and for one another. It’s also cathartic for the fans but that part isn’t so important. Souray kind of almost responded at the end of the second but they really did need someone to go over and actually fight the guy without the linesmen already there. But, if we’re talking about a response like putting one of their best players torso-first into the boards then yeah, that’s stupid-talk.
by Scott Reynolds on Nov 26, 2009 8:54 AM MST up reply actions
Is running him into the boards every time he’s near the puck “stupid-talk”?
Even if it’s a half-step late? Until he pulls himself out of the game?
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Not necessarily. There’s a fine line. I guess I’m saying that you don’t do something that might end the guy’s career. Make life miserable sure, but no knee-on-knee crap or launching him head-first into the boards or sucker-punching. That stuff, IMO, is stupid-talk in terms of retribution.
by Scott Reynolds on Nov 26, 2009 10:32 AM MST up reply actions
It may be stupid talk, but it might be satisfying if, just once, someone did something nasty to someone who put out a star player. It might be worth the fiver to send a message. Hell, all you really need to do is bury your shoulder into his skull. He’ll be gone for weeks and, funny enough, it’s totally legal.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
I don’t think that would ever end up being satisfying because when Todd Bertuzzi comes to the microphone and says, “He deserved it because he hit my teammate and I had to punch him in the back of the head” it’s just flat-out embarrassing to be a fan of the team.
by Scott Reynolds on Nov 26, 2009 12:03 PM MST up reply actions
Who would have to go to a mic anywhere? Do you know who Mike Richards is?
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Not too sure what you’re implying with this. If you’re referring to the Booth hit, at least that took place in the context of the game and didn’t look, to me, like explicit goonery. I doubt that Richards got onto the ice thinking, “I’m going to hurt that bastard David Booth!” They should be penalizing that kind of hit but I don’t see these two situations as being at all similar.
by Scott Reynolds on Nov 27, 2009 8:58 AM MST up reply actions
Nope, not retaliation in kind
Souray had a chance to plant Kopitar from behind about 5 minutes after the Hemsky hit and, to his credit, he didn’t do it. But absolutely, teammates need to respond in the “we got your back” sense. With all the smurfs and pacifists on our team we don’t have “team truculence” so have to pick our spots. The best spot is right when the shit happens, as Stortini did when that punk from Colorado headshotted Moreau. Of course in Gary Bettman’s NHL they got the powerplay and we got the two guys in the room, but it would have been totally worth it if Storts had done a little more thorough job on the guy. The main thing was it did turn the game in our favour, and I think that “we’ve got your back” aspect was a big part of it, and the “eff you Colorado” was part of it too.
Still, I’d rather the other guys were thinking twice — or even once — before they ran our guys heads through the wall. I’ve seen far too much of that lately, and I’m bloody sick of it.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 26, 2009 10:42 AM MST up reply actions
I think Bruce rbought up that we should get read for a lottery pick. I am all up for that. This season’s top 5 are again great. And one of taylor/tyler or fowler will be worth it in the long term!!
Wasn't me
The only time I have mentioned “lottery pick” was when I wished Brian Burke good luck in winning the lottery. :)
Some people mistakenly refer to Sam Gagner (6th overall) as a lottery pick, but he wasn’t by my definition. Of course all non-playoff teams can win the lottery and move up four spots, but to me you have to be in the bottom 5 with a chance to move up to #1 before I would call it a “lottery pick”. But I’m not sure the term has been officially defined.
Oilers have only once in their history have drafted in the top 5 (and completely blew the pick on Jason Bonsignore). It’s not part of the equation around here, where even teams that miss the playoffs manage to hang around into March and finish 9th or 11th or something in the West, never right down the chart.
Still, the way this season is shaping up, all bets are off. I’m usually too optimistic to talk about the lottery, but today I’m feeling pretty darn negative about the whole thing.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 26, 2009 11:01 AM MST up reply actions
I would argue that talking lottery is optimism.
I’m not a huge Sam Gagner believer, but he looks like the second-best player we could have picked at that spot and he’s a legitimate NHLer at a stupidly young age. I’d much rather have a guy like him or even someone better contributing at 18 or 19 than picking twelfth and grabbing another Andrew Cogliano/Rob Schremp sort of guy. Let’s face it, if we’re missing the playoffs anyway, does it make a difference if we miss the hell out of the playoffs?
by Benjamin Massey on Nov 26, 2009 11:04 AM MST up reply actions
Sorry
Derek mentioned that lottery pick is coming our way!!
I agree with you. Gagner wasnt a lottery pick. However, I am a Gagner believer and I think he will be really good when he figures it out. I think he got rushed into the NHL and soon should become a more regular contributor to the score sheet.
Where have you gone, Robert Schremp(io)? A nation turns its lonely eyes to you
Woo woo woo
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
I never meant to be so bad to you,
One thing I said that I would never do.
A look from you and I would fall from grace,
And that would wipe the smile right from my face.
(Okay, I’m stopping now.)
by Benjamin Massey on Nov 26, 2009 10:46 AM MST up reply actions
One Wing Flappin'
On a related note
Horcov sure played like a one-armed Hockey player last night.
It hurt to watch him.
.
I wonder if the Oilers can replace him with anothe Russkie
There’s some available
I hear Burke might sign Wuepenkov and it’ll be
Chovellov to Buffalo
RE: Visnovsky
From Vic Ferrari over at Tyler’s site:
And at EV, Visnovsky on the ice for 10 D zone draws and zero offensive zone draws. Damn, that’s a strange use of an elite offensive defender.
by Jonathan Willis on Nov 26, 2009 11:04 AM MST reply actions
To which my reply is “okay, who the hell else do you trust out there?” My list is “Ladislav Smid and maybe Tom Gilbert” and one and a half defensemen isn’t quite a pairing.
by Benjamin Massey on Nov 26, 2009 11:06 AM MST up reply actions
How many O zone draws did we have? I know JDD froze a lot of pucks at our end of the sheet.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 26, 2009 11:12 AM MST up reply actions
Just looked it up. There were 16 faceoffs in the O-zone and 26 in the D. 4 of the 16 followed LA penalties and 4 more occurred during those powerplays. Meaning Oilers forced all of 8 faceoffs in the O zone while 5v5. Presumably some/many/most of those happened at the end of a Visnovsky shift, I’d have to look at the play-by-play in more detail. But the bottom line is there were precious few opportunities to get offensive players out in offensive situations, because there barely were any offensive situations.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 26, 2009 11:29 AM MST up reply actions

by 



























