Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Should Encourage Juan Mata

Shawnny-on-the-dot

Photo

Hockey is a game of puck battles, but its statistical measurement of same is limited to just three categories: the contentious and subjective "Real Time Scoring System" metrics known as Giveaways and Takeaways, and Faceoffs won and lost. The latter are both much better defined and far more frequent. Moreover, being what the soccer guys call "set pieces", the coaches and players themselves have much more say about who is involved in faceoffs.

Just four years ago the Oilers were aces of the faceoff dot, 2nd in the NHL. Since then, however, Oilers faceoff efficiency has spiralled right down the crapper: 

2005-06: 53.4%, 2nd  
2006-07: 51.5%, 8th   
2007-08: 50.5%, 12th  
2008-09: 47.9%, 25th  
2009-10: 47.7%, 26th 

Interesting to see how the faceoff load has been shared  over those years. After the jump are the top four guys from each season, listed in order of draws taken per GP:

Star-divide

 

Player FO/G FO%
2005-06:
Horcoff 18.2 52.7%
Stoll 16.4 56.8%
Peca 14.8 54.9%
Reasoner 9.0 52.5%
2006-07:
Horcoff 17.8 50.6%
Stoll 17.7 55.6%
Reasoner 10.6 54.6%
Pouliot 7.7 48.7%
2007-08:
Horcoff 18.2 50.6%
Stoll 15.2 55.1%
Reasoner 11.0 52.8%
Cogliano 6.6 39.5%
2008-09:
Horcoff 22.0 53.9%
Brodziak 12.0 51.6%
Gagner 9.1 42.0%
Cogliano 8.6 37.2%
2009-10:
Horcoff 21.7 51.4%
Brule 10.3 49.5%
Gagner 9.5 43.9%
Cogliano 7.2 37.2%

The constant all those years has been Shawn Horcoff, leading the team in draws per game every year, and in overall draws every year but one (the year of his shoulder injury). Horcoff has consistently kept his head above water a little above the 50% line, which is more impressive than it looks given he typically takes way more faceoffs on the penalty kill than the powerplay. (Special teams percentages are split roughly 55/45 in favour of the team with the man advantage.)  

What has changed are the guys underneath Shawn. After Peca left in the summer of '06, Stoll and Reasoner continued to carry their weight and make the Oilers an above-average, if deteriorating, group. But when both Jarret and Marty departed in the summer of '08, the bottom fell out. Horcoff's workload soared from ~18 to ~22 faceoffs per game, and he now typically takes more draws per game than the next two Oilers combined. First Brodziak, now Brule have been barely adequate second choices in the circle although both have displayed other weaknesses in their game becoming their lack of experience. Gagner and Cogliano have both been inadequate both on the dot and in the defensive zone generally. 

The new season is now 13 games old, enough to show that not much has changed since 2008-09 other than Brule in Brodziak's spot. Horcoff remains a workhorse who wins more than his share; Gagner and Cogliano continue to languish near the 40% mark in limited, if not limited enough, exposure. Pat Quinn is learning what Craig MacTavish knew well: it's pretty much impossible to hide two pivots who can't win a draw. And the Oilers continue to rank in the bottom quarter of the NHL in an area of former strength.

One thing that has changed this season is faceoff distribution. Brule has taken just 4 faceoffs on special teams, which figures since he plays under half a minute per game on each unit. Penner, who plays significant minutes on both, is 11/14 on the PP but hasn't taken a single draw on the PK which begs the question as Derek would say. Especially when Cogliano and O'Sullivan are 2/11 and 4/14 respectively on the PK. 

Instead, the load has fallen even more on Shawn Horcoff. In '08-09 he took about a third of all faceoffs at even strength but nearly half of all faceoffs on both special teams (49.3% of PP draws, 49.5% of SH). In the new season he continues to take about 35% of even strength draws; once again the lion's share of these are in his own end of the rink. However, in the absence of Brodziak from the PK unit, his responsibility has soared to the point where he has taken over 64% !! of all shorthanded draws to this point in the season. His PP draws, meanwhile, have dropped to 40% of team, as Gagner, Penner and O'Sullivan are getting tabbed more frequently for this duty. No doubt this distribution has had some effect on Horcoff's point production. On the plus side, the much-maligned penalty-kill unit has improved from 27th in the NHL to 18th at this point; surely the faceoff workhorse deserves some credit for that improvement.  

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

First Brodziak, now Brule have been barely adequate second choices in the circle although both have displayed other weaknesses in their game becoming their lack of experience.

    Considering the amount of defensive zone faceoffs that both had to take, I don’t agree at all with your “barely adequate” connotation. If you’re speaking as an overall player, yes, I might agree. If you’re speaking purely as a faceoff man, these guys are much better than “barely adequate”.

This team really does miss Brodziak.

which begs the question as Derek would say.

Bruce, you’re fired.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 30, 2009 10:04 PM MDT reply actions  

Let me clarify

I’m not speaking purely about their ability on the dot, at which Brodziak is/was a little above average, and Brule is proving to be, uh, adequate. I’m talking about their suitability as choices to take those D-zone faceoffs, which includes their play after the draw is won/lost. They’re young players, and it’s unfair to expect them to be defensive whizzes. I remain disappointed the Oilers gave up on Brodziak as early as they did.

Bottom line: one veteran centre is not enough. Which I realize is not exactly a new observation.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 30, 2009 10:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t care so much if he’s a veteran but the needed player does need to be able to play defence and win draws at a rate of better than 45%. Ryan O’Reilly may only be 18 but he’s done just fine for the Avs so far, which is a good thing for them because that’s a team with even bigger FO problems than the Oilers.

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 31, 2009 12:24 AM MDT up reply actions  

I dont think it is the player’s problem as much as it is the organisation’s many of our kids got rushed in too soon.

About taking FO, a certain friend of mine gives credit to Adam Oates, who helped young Horcoff and Stoll learn the art of taking FO. I thought the hiring of Mike Sillinger was done to help the kids learn the handling of the dot better. I was wrong.

by SumOil on Oct 31, 2009 9:06 AM MDT up reply actions  

I was going to mention Oates

He helped Stoll and Horcoff for sure, likely Reasoner as well.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 31, 2009 11:03 AM MDT up reply actions  

Reasoner was already very good before Oates got there. In the two years before Oates he went 53.5% and 55.5%. Both he and Marchant were consistently good which is why I have some trouble with the Oates theory. What “special tricks” did he have to enlighten our boys that someone like Reasoner, Marchant or MacTavish didn’t? Only Horcoff shows a marked improvement in the year Oates came in and there were a couple of guys (Mike York, Ryan Smyth) who surely were trying to get better but the “magic morning Oates” didn’t help them. I always took any of the, “Wow Oates is a great faceoff mentor” as a diversion from his more general suckitude, i.e., it was a myth (though apparently a powerful one).

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 31, 2009 11:12 AM MDT up reply actions  

Don’t disagree that he sucked. I do remember Stoll in particular saying he learned a lot on the dot from the old man.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 31, 2009 1:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL