Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: News And Other Updates Leading Up To Pats-Giants

PDO Numbers

There's a theory out there (which I subscribe to, with certain caveats) which states that NHL players have no noticeable impact on on-ice save percentage, and a small impact on on-ice shooting percentage.

Therefore, since these things fluctuate quite a bit between players on the same team, we can chalk much of it up to luck, bounces, and other unrepeatable stuff - and these things can make us regard players as either better or worse than they really are.

Enter PDO numbers.  The PDO number is a simple measure of even-strength on-ice shooting percentage and save percentage.  The league average, for obvious reasons, is 100.  After the jump: those numbers for the Oilers so far this season.

Star-divide

Forwards

Defence

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

that is sv% + Sh% right?

by SumOil on Oct 29, 2009 9:24 AM MDT reply actions  

Right

Specifically, it’s team Save% + team Shooting% when a given player is on the ice.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 29, 2009 10:05 AM MDT up reply actions  

PDO numbers have always struck me as an oversimplified number based on oversimplified analysis. But they can still tell you something, and a team PDO in the 105 range when our players are as historically average-to-below-average as they are is trouble.

by Benjamin Massey on Oct 29, 2009 10:27 AM MDT reply actions  

Well, that’s quite the comment.

What exactly are you looking for? It’s just giving a rough idea of puck luck and an indicator of which way the regression will point as the sample size builds.

It’s never been presented any other way to my knowledge and I’m not sure how that can be termed as an oversimplification.

by RiversQ on Oct 29, 2009 10:43 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

Well, I’m quite a guy.

I think the line between “rough look at the puck luck” and “oversimplification” is a very, very narrow one.

by Benjamin Massey on Oct 29, 2009 10:50 AM MDT up reply actions  

More importantly you need to check a distribution over the team. How a pplayer is performing over the curve….
Also a team can have a higher PDO number than the other one. There are teams like TOR whose PDO number shouldlower than 100(right now)

by SumOil on Oct 29, 2009 11:04 AM MDT up reply actions  

The problem I think is the expectation that PDO will regress to 100. For forwards with great or poor finish, this can obviously swing the mean value upwards, and if your team plays behind a great or awful goaltender the same will happen. Even at the team level when SH% evens out more, SV% won’t as much.

I think it’s only meaningful when the points above or below 100 are significant (e.g. 5 or higher). Personally I like to look at SH% and SV% separately as I think combining them is mixing two distinct effects.

by R O on Oct 29, 2009 2:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

H1N1

So swine flu improves PDO?

Dustin Penner: 111.8
Gilbert Brule: 108.1
Ales Hemsky: 105.8
Ladislav Smid: 110.6
Lubomir Visnovsky: 108.8

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 29, 2009 11:31 AM MDT reply actions  

Think about it. Would you lay a hard body check on a guy with some swine flu?

by Benjamin Massey on Oct 29, 2009 11:39 AM MDT up reply actions  

Sure. I just need some Echinacea :)

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 29, 2009 12:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

No, what you need is Cold FX: straight from the hands of Don Cherry!

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 29, 2009 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 52 32 15 5 69
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Colorado 54 26 25 3 55
Calgary 52 24 22 6 54
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.4.2012 at 4:07 PM MST)

20 - 26 - 5

Won 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (22-7, .759)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (11-6, .647)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-11, .593)
  6. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  7. Los Angeles Kings (9-9, .500)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (11-12, .478)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-14, .440)
  10. Edmonton Oilers (11-14, .440)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  12. Colorado Avalanche (8-13, .381)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (20-3, .870)
  2. New York Rangers (17-8, .680)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-8, .667)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-9, .609)
  5. Washington Capitals (12-12, .500)
  6. Toronto Maple Leafs (12-12, .500)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (10-10, .500)
  8. Ottawa Senators (10-11, .476)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (10-13, .435)
  10. Florida Panthers (7-10, .412)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. New Jersey Devils (8-12, .400)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (7-14, .333)
  14. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (8-19, .296)

Division Standings

  1. Central (50-38, .568)
  2. Northeast (46-37, .554)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (36-36, .500)
  5. Northwest (33-43, .434)
  6. Southeast (32-51, .386)

The Oilers Top 25 Under 25


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL