Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Infuriating Jose Molina

Reinventing the hitting game

One of the strongest accusations against Craig MacTavish's Oilers was that they were far too easy to play against. Steve Tambellini said as much in his post-firing news conference in which he promised the matter would be addressed.

There is no foolproof measure of easy-to-play-against-ness. Perhaps the best of an imperfect lot is the much-maligned Real Time Scoring System (RTSS) stat known as "hits". To me this is one of those double-edged categories like penalty minutes, where you don't really want your team to have the most in the league nor the fewest. Too few hits might be a sign of a soft team; too many a result of not having the puck often enough.

Last year's Oilers finished 28th in the league in hits; under Pat Quinn they have crept up to 19th. Quinn's strategy is simple: put a physical player on each line and give the guy some actual ice time to ply his craft.

Early season stats bear this out:

Star-divide

Player  GP  TOI TOI/GP Hits Hits/15
Jean-Francois Jacques 9 123.8 13.8 36 4.36
Zack Stortini 9 84.7 9.4 23 4.07
Ryan Stone 8 93.1 11.6 19 3.06
Gilbert Brule 7 90.4 12.9 17 2.82

 

These four guys rank 1-2-3-4 on the team in both total hits and hits per unit ice time (expressed here on the Copper & Blue as per 15 minutes played). No other Oiler forward has even reached double digits, nor as many as 1.3 hits per 15. But the four leaders have been a fixture every game, at least until Brule got sick and Stone went down with injury.

Last year's Oilers also featured exactly four forwards who had 2 or more hits for every 15 minutes played. Here's the foursome in question:

Player  GP  TOI TOI/GP Hits Hits/15
Tim Sestito 1 5.9 5.9 3 7.63
Steve MacIntyre 22 86.1 3.9 22 3.83
Jean-Francois Jacques 7 51.6 7.4 13 3.78
Zack Stortini 52 379.0 7.3 95 3.76

There are Jacques and Stortini at a pace just below what they have established early in '09-10, MacIntyre keeping pace with them, and Sestito a one-game wonder. The key difference is ice time. The four guys played a combined total of just 82 GP, meaning that in a given game one of them might be playing, the rest sitting. Even the guy who did play, didn't play much, as none of the four averaged as much as 8 minutes TOI. The four leaders in hits per unit ice time finished 29-21-25-4 in total hits, as only Stortini accumulated enough ice time to achieve respectable counting numbers.

The team leader in total hits, Erik Cole, reached his modest total of 134 in just 63 games (1.87 hits/15) before being shipped out at the deadline. His physical play was not replaced on the roster; moreover, MacTavish pressboxed Stortini to make room for the incoming Patrick O'Sullivan and Ales Kotalik. An already untenable situation became much worse. Coincidentally (or not!), the Oilers folded down the stretch, often being pushed around right in their own building.

Craig MacTavish used his four heaviest hitters for a combined total of 522 minutes over 82 games, just 6.4 minutes per game. After just 9 games Pat Quinn has already used his equivalent crew for 392 minutes, or 43.6 per night. While this has led to other issues -- JFJ and Stone have looked out of their depths at times on the top two lines -- the problem of too many smurfs has been largely masked to this point. Kinks remain to be worked out, but early evidence suggests Quinn's more aggressive strategy has been working just fine.

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Quinn’s more aggressive strategy has been working just fine

It always comes down to the result eh!!!

by SumOil on Oct 24, 2009 9:32 AM MDT reply actions  

But i have to say. The presence of Stone and JFJ has led to more exciting hockey. The thunderous hits in the BoA were just awesome to watch. Effective or not(in the long run), its exciting.

by SumOil on Oct 24, 2009 9:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

"Early results suggest ..."

But yes, SumOil, it does come down to the result. A little entertainment along the way is a good thing though. As is not laying back and letting the other guys set the tempo.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 24, 2009 10:14 AM MDT up reply actions  

I am with you on this one. Once Pisani is back one of the coke machines will have to go.
Its a toss up between JFJ and Stone. Who do you like more?

by SumOil on Oct 24, 2009 10:25 AM MDT up reply actions  

Tough call

For now Stone is out so he may have to wait his turn to get back in the line-up. JFJ is more of a chaos player, especially in the Oilers’ defensive zone which is going to keep getting him in trouble.
When the inevitable slumps hit (as you allude in your next comment), who gets benched will likely hinge on how those guys are performing right at the time. It may well be that Stone draws back in when Quinn decides to sit down one of the other guys for performance reasons.
What I don’t think will happen is a line-up of 10 or more forwards who don’t play the hitting game, as happened too often last year IMO.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 24, 2009 12:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Stone’s underliers are damned close to being orders of magnitude better than Jacques.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 24, 2009 4:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

i was merely suggesting that till we dont go into slumps, no one is going to criticize it

by SumOil on Oct 24, 2009 10:26 AM MDT up reply actions  

Entertainment versus Function

Some make the argument that some hits are more entertaining than useful in the long run.

I’d say hits are useful in all forms except for dirty hits, like the knee-on-knees and the checking from behind plays. Interference is not dirty but hitting away from the puck is interesting too. Refer to the Torres on Michalek hit.

Hockey is entertainment, and no matter what the result of a hitting play, entertainment is entertainment.

Are hits more useful when they turn the puck over or when they intimidate the opponent? Depends on what affects the game result in the end I suppose. If you get scoring chances from puck possession or you rattle your opponent – both are important.

If they score due to a scoring chance from a turnover, we’re entertained.

If they demolish an opponent due to a big hit, we’re entertained.

If the other team is intimidated and our team is dominating, we’re entertained.

Even if both teams are hitting hard, the game isn’t boring.

A win-win in all situations! :-D

RT40 writes with An Oilers Refinery and is an avid hockey fan.

by raventalon40 on Oct 24, 2009 12:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ha! Derek in particular will love that!

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 24, 2009 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sum’s original comment. It seemed like the kind of snark you’d appreciate since you tend to harp on people who employ results-oriented thinking.

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 24, 2009 4:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sir, I do not harp.

It just kills puppies, that’s all.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 24, 2009 7:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL