Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Last of the Neanderthals

The ball players you loved as a kid are gone
They've been replaced by steroid fed neanderthals
Shattered, Shattered, when people aren't always what they seem
--Dropkick Murphys, Shattered


It seems the Oilers were committed to developing an intelligent organization. Now that another man in is charge of personnel, who knows if this will remain the case. Steve Tambellini is, however, left with the task of trying to meld old-school "work harder" players with the braniacs brought into the system over the last few years. Brawn versus intellect, the toilers versus intelligentsia, the proletariat versus the bourgeoisie, if you will. Of course, anyone holding the the opposite point-of-view would say it's melding the hard-working versus the lazy, the motivated versus the entitled.

A social split along class lines is inevitable in any grouping of people -- it's part of the human condition. It's no great stretch to assume that a similar fracture occurred in the Oilers locker room. Reports throughout the year talked about a locker room split, beginning with the now-notorious quote from a veteran which, incidentally, led to one of the best posts in hockey forum history by slipper. After that quote, it seemed that all of the knowing reporters now felt the dam was broken and they were free to talk about it. Even the beat guys began discussing the fracture. It was pegged as old versus young, or MacTavish versus young, veterans versus young, and even MacTavish loyalists versus young, but in all cases, the youth of the hockey club was playing the interloper.

Was it just a bunch of damned whippersnappers that wouldn't get off of the old guys' lawns? Or was there something deeper going on in that locker room? Remember, it's the youth on this team that is the leading edge of the intelligence drafted by Kevin Lowe. The locker room was slowly filled with some really bright young kids in Tom Gilbert, Sam Gagner, Andrew Cogliano, and Dustin Penner and if we are to believe a wave of media reports, that locker room suddenly shattered. There's a possibility that something more is at work - anti-intellectualism from some subset of players that were "not the youth". It's entirely believable that Ethan Moreau would be the leader of the such movement within the club. Ethan has never been mistaken with Alexander Graham Bell or Enrico Fermi and it was Ethan blaming the power play and the goal-scoring in post-game interviews. Never a word about the second-worst penalty kill in the league, no, it was those damned kids that couldn't score goals. Surrounded by a bunch of smart and smart-assed kids, an enormous change from his known environment, he told them that they were doing it wrong and was rebuffed. He looked around the locker room and realized that he was the last of the neanderthals and began a campaign to assert his version of locker room chemistry. At that point the locker room was split - pick a social strata and see what happens in the room.

"Marge, try to understand. There are two kinds of college students -- jocks and nerds. As a jock, it is my duty to give nerds a hard time!

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting idea coach. I would disagree that social classes are based on intelligence, but I still think you make two very interesting points:

a- that there are a version of social class. Those that are young, smart, etc . . . and those that are older and vets (I personally think Strudie, Staois, and Horc are smart). Being influenced by Marxist social theory, I would suggest that we examine these through 'struggle' rather then 'biology'.

For example the older group's identity is constructed through a different type of struggle: one that involves the cup run, many training camps, being low draft picks, and being traded with families. The second/younger group has an identity based on different material struggles: living up to the hype of being a high draft pick, transforming their game from collage to the pros, and losing seasons.

To construct an group/class identity all the members need to construct their identity on shared activity in a struggle. The only experience I see that could serve as this is the last few playoff last gasps and the losing seasons. This might not have been the best environment to build an identity together in, and leaves two separate groups identifying with there own struggles.

b- anti-intellectualism: is this players not knowing (over thinking) their roles? or simply those players that where taught not to respect intelligence but rather value hard-work and sacrifice, transfering this on to their new team mates. I am really wondering how anti-intellectualism would operate in a hockey club, but if it is based on my experience in the job market or at university I think your conclusions make sense. (just for the record, I get called an anti-intellectual on a regular basis at my school)

by B.C.B. on Jun 8, 2009 6:25 AM MDT reply actions  

I would disagree that social classes are based on intelligence,

I don't think that they always are based on intelligence, but there are certainly classes that are defined by intelligence, dating back to ancient greece.

To construct an group/class identity all the members need to construct their identity on shared activity in a struggle. The only experience I see that could serve as this is the last few playoff last gasps and the losing seasons. This might not have been the best environment to build an identity together in, and leaves two separate groups identifying with there own struggles.

Wow, this is strong. It's something I hadn't considered, but appealing as an explanation.


b- anti-intellectualism: is this players not knowing (over thinking) their roles? or simply those players that where taught not to respect intelligence but rather value hard-work and sacrifice, transfering this on to their new team mates. I am really wondering how anti-intellectualism would operate in a hockey club, but if it is based on my experience in the job market or at university I think your conclusions make sense. (just for the record, I get called an anti-intellectual on a regular basis at my school).

I think hockey lends itself to an atmosphere of regular intelligence bashing based on how kids are taught coming into various systems. It's very similar to the military. Head down, listen to the man in charge and work harder. Don't think, work harder.

by Coach pb9617 on Jun 8, 2009 12:33 PM MDT reply actions  

Coach, while I see your analogy between hockey and the military I think we could extend it to school as well. Most of the time in schools (from grade school to university) I think the over all message is "head down, listen to the man in charge and work harder". Thinking or creative critique is not encouraged, but instead an obedience to the boss/professor/coach is strongly ingrained, and the production of drivel homework/academic papers is promoted.

Thinking in this way, leads me to see the intellectual Oilers draft picks as having a similar mind set to the old boys school. It is just that they are taught in a different way. I think the Oilers made good decisions with hiring Quinn and Renney since they will be able to tap into this ingrained ideology of work/being a hockey player in multiple ways that maybe MacT was not able to.

by B.C.B. on Jun 9, 2009 8:09 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 54 34 15 5 73
Colorado 56 28 25 3 59
Minnesota 54 25 21 8 58
Calgary 55 25 22 8 58
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.11.2012 at 6:02 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (14-5, .737)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (18-7, .720)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-13, .552)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-14,.333)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-40, .565)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (38-36, .514)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL