Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Love Me Tender

Roberto Luongo collapsed. Because of this, Vancouver may or may not sell the stellar goaltender to the highest bidder to hold onto the Sedinettes. Miikka Kiprusoff is in the midst of the longest day and enormous contracts for Henrik Lundqvist and Evgeni Nabokov have meant nothing to the sucess of their respective teams. There is an undercurrent of chatter about the relative worth of goaltending and what the big-ticket goaltender should be able to deliver, namely Stanley Cups.

Lowetide has proposed, and I heartily endorse his proposition, that success in a post-expansion world be measured by pennants, not cups. I took one step back in this experiment and decided to see which goalies were playing for pennants. Below is a look at a simple measure of goaltenders that have played for a pennant since the lockout. I'm focused solely on save percentage in this post, but if this looks useful, I might throw in some other stats.

The number at the left is the individual save percentage rank in the NHL that season for qualifying goalies. In 05-06 there were 47 qualifying goalies, in 06-07 there were 44, 07-08 there were 44 and the number of qualifiers in 08-09 was 46. The bracketed number to the right is the individual save percentage rank in the NHL since the lockout based on qualifed goalies with more than a single season. There are 52 such goalies since 05-06.



Only three goalies from the bottom half of the league have been able to play for a pennant - Cam Ward, Marty Turco and Chris Osgood.

One thing you may notice that is missing from the bracketed numbers column - values that are 10 and under. None of the post-lockout top 10 save percentage goalies have played for a pennant.

I'll have a more complete look at the list soon.

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting stuff, coach. What would you say it means?
Of those goalies, Khabibulin, Fleury, Turco and Giguere were all big ticket goalies.
The medium ticket ones (under $3 million) are Osgood, Ward, Biron, Miller, Emery, Ward, and Hasek (as I recall in his case).
Four big tickets and six out of the 16 pennant-winning teams had big ticket guys.
So you clearly don't need the big ticket to cash in. . . Given that it's also easier to find goalies and not have to give up high picks, that they come from all over the place, this presents some interesting options for acquiring goalies and signing them. . .
At the same, time, the relative ease of finding a goalie good enough to take you to the pennant is balanced by the relative value you get from spending money on a goalie, something Dellow has been writing about . . . Can't say I've come to any conclusions here, other than the fact that a team should try to sign and develop as many 20-25 year old goalies as possible -- and the Oil sure didn't do that 2004-06, did they (or whenever it was the team lacked its own farm team).

by dstaples on May 17, 2009 5:00 PM MDT reply actions  

Interesting stuff, coach. What would you say it means?

I'm not quite sure yet. Most of the goalies that are playing for the pennants are coming from the second tier and they play at the high edge of their capabilities for a year.

Maybe the overall talent level on those teams is higher because their teams have an extra $2-$3 million to spend in front of them. Maybe it's luck. Maybe it's sample size and this will straighten out soon.

So you clearly don't need the big ticket to cash in.

Doesn't seem like they are necessary, that's for sure.

by Coach pb9617 on May 18, 2009 8:53 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 54 34 15 5 73
Colorado 56 28 25 3 59
Minnesota 54 25 21 8 58
Calgary 55 25 22 8 58
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.11.2012 at 1:04 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (14-5, .737)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (18-7, .720)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-13, .552)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-14,.333)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-40, .565)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (38-36, .514)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL