Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods Makes His 2012 PGA Tour Debut

Get Off Of My Lawn

Craig MacTavish has been defended in some quarters as a good developer of 'kids'. In fact, Lowetide himself defended the coach thusly :

"Do me a favor and find me an NHL coach who has given as many at-bats to kids with a better record than MacT since the run to the Stanley. I'll look forward to it. Should be, two, three pages."



While I don't dispute that MacTavish has been saddled with a large number of developmental prospects through the lack of foresight by the organization, I will dispute that he's done as much as he can with those prospects.

This is a chart comparing total games played by rookies as defined by the NHL, by franchise from the 2006-2007 season through the 2008-2009 season. [Click the image to zoom]




As you can see, the Blue Jackets lead the league in this category with 810, followed by the Oilers at 797 and Chicago with 768. Over that time, the Oilers have put up 240 points, the Blue Jackets 241 and the Blackhawks 250. That the Oilers and MacTavish are special, it seems, isn't accurate. Note here that San Jose is in the company of a number of teams that have done a complete rebuild and have maintained a high level of play.

Perhaps a closer look at the type of games played will show that the Oilers and MacTavish especially are outperforming expectations.

This is a chart comparing total significant games played by rookies, which I'm defining as 1/3 of a season or greater, by franchise from the 2006-2007 season through the 2008-2009 season.




Edmonton rookies have played 655 games, two-thirds of a season more than the Blue Jackets at 593. Chicago has played 550 and Phoenix joins this conversation at 600 games played and 221 points, well below their counterparts.

There was also sentiment that Lemaire develops kids, best expressed here by doritogrande. While that may or may not be true, the simple fact is that over the last three years, the Wild are in the bottom six in games played by rookies at 318 and bottom ten in significant games played by rookies at 221. Lemaire isn't going great guns with the young 'uns.

Back to the issue at hand, it looks like MacTavish is outperforming Gretzky, as always. He's neck-and-neck against Columbus and Chicago. Looking at this season alone:



MacTavish isn't playing rookies this year. The only significant game rookie is Liam Reddox. Both Chicago and Columbus are still bringing kids along, so at least for this season, there is no longer an excuse that he has to bring the kids along with him. There are two other teams in the range of Edmonton over the last three years as far as rookie games played and they are about even to slightly better in points. They are also about to accomplish something MacTavish hasn't been able to do in three years: land a playoff berth. Of course, there isn't any single coach that has had as many rookie games as MacTavish because the two teams in the same range have done something the Oilers haven't: fired their coach.

Here are the numbers overall:

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yup coach, you nailed it. I'm not a numbers guy, I just go with what I can observe (the sociologist in me running rampant...), but these numbers support my argument too. Thanks for the link/shameless plug over at my house. I'm sure you saw we added you to our wall of blogs worth reading.

by shepso on Apr 1, 2009 9:13 PM MDT reply actions  

That's you? I didn't realize. I love the work you guys do. It's fantastic.

by Coach pb9617 on Apr 1, 2009 9:21 PM MDT reply actions  

Really? Wow coach, thanks!!!! That really means a lot. That is myself and BCB over there featuring a few contributions by our friend Sachia who never seems to blog anywhere else, sadly. We're both grad students who have been living out of town the past while. It gives us a nice break from our work and allows us to really take the crazy philosophy we both study and apply it outside of the classroom sometimes, which explains the Foucault, Badiou and Mao references all over the place...that and we're both diehard fans! It's been more than appreciated to know that you and a few of the other regulars on LT are checking us out.

thanks!

by shepso on Apr 2, 2009 1:23 AM MDT reply actions  

I'm a philo junkie, so for me reading that stuff is fantastic. Inspired by your posts, I almost wrote a Jungian collective unconscious post about Edmonton fans and Horcoff and Penner. I decided I was out of my league and stopped before embarrassing myself though.

by Coach pb9617 on Apr 2, 2009 7:59 AM MDT reply actions  

That would have been a thing of beauty! Personally, I've been thinking about relating it to more of a Halbwachs-related collective memory thing, but Jung would have been spectacular! I think you should do it. At this point, what have you got to lose?!

by shepso on Apr 2, 2009 10:01 AM MDT reply actions  

I think it works so well because the conscious ego is the "saw him good/bad" stuff, the collective unconscious becomes the groupthink of the fanboards and knuckleheads in the bar. Maybe I'll put some work towards it.

by Coach pb9617 on Apr 2, 2009 11:54 AM MDT reply actions  

It might be more interesting if it was possible to corelate with quality of rookies. I suspect it would lean more in McTavish's favor.

Just looking at top picks since 2003:

Columbus has selected 4th, 8th, 6th, 6th, 7th, and 6th.

Chicago has selected 14th, 3rd, 7th, 3rd, 1st, and 11th.

Edmonton has selected 22nd, 14th, 25th, 45th, 6th, and 22nd.

Perhaps an argument can be made that McTavish has been too successful with what he's been given for rookies and the Oilers just haven't been "bad" enough to get the top 10 picks the other teams have gotten?

by Ted on Apr 2, 2009 3:46 PM MDT reply actions  

I am with Oilswell here, the comparable teams have had better picks then us (and you can add LA and PHX to that list as well). While I won't argue that MacT has been perfect with developing prospects, I would have to say that the the organization has been lack high skill youngsters and the kids he has been developing were to normal fit into grinder roles (both because that is how he coaches and because that is where the team has been hurt alot). Also, the fact that the Oilers have had so many rookie games played is the serious injuries the Oilers have had in the last three seasons.

But if you look at the blue line on that chart it does seem like we are on the lower scale of Pts for rookies . . . and you can compare that to teams that have better, worst, and the same overall draft position. so my point might be moot.

PS: thanks for the kind gossip.

by B.C.B. on Apr 2, 2009 5:45 PM MDT reply actions  

It might be more interesting if it was possible to corelate with quality of rookies. I suspect it would lean more in McTavish's favor.

I'm not going to correlate quality of rookie, I'm going to correlate draft position of the rookie playing. I'll have it up next week, I think.

by Coach pb9617 on Apr 2, 2009 10:33 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Calgary 54 25 22 7 57
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.9.2012 at 7:25 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-39, .571)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL