Post-Lubo goal scoring: a new paradigm? :)

Stortini 3Souray 3
Penner 3
Hemsky 2
Horcoff 2
Gagner 2
Cole 1
Pouliot 1
Cogliano 1
Brodziak 1
Reddox 1
Nilsson 0
Moreau 0
All D but SS 0
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Just out of curiosity, hows that rock of yours? Had a chance to do some compositional analysis yet?
by Unleaded on Feb 19, 2009 1:48 PM MST reply actions
When it comes to analytical science I'm just a facilitator, but yes the work has been done and the experts agree it's an H4 chondrite.
Much more at my recently updated website.
by Bruce on Feb 19, 2009 4:00 PM MST reply actions
I just wonder why they weren't doing it until now? I'll have to keep a better eye on it but it seems like it might have something to do with when they are getting on the ice.
Whatever it is, please continue to do so. Pretty please. Maybe show some of our more skilled players how effective the plain ol' hustle can be.
Nice updates on the rocks! That stuff is pretty wild.
by Ribs on Feb 20, 2009 11:54 PM MST reply actions
Often times, the Oilers rely too much on Hemsky and though at first glance Hemsky looks like a ballhog, it soon becomes apparent that the other Oilers, such as Horcoff (who was good at faceoffs tonight but atrocious at all other things hockey-related) and Penner become spectators who expect him to set them up perfectly or find them in a tough situation. Sometimes that means Horcoff stand on the half-boards waiting for a one-time pass that has no business being tried; sometimes this is Penner along the corner boards waiting for the cycle that was defeated at the blue line (due to lack of puck support which provides passing lane options to Hemsky, the puck-carrier). The outcome of this is Penner and Horcoff (two players who can skate) becoming spectators in what is not a spectator sport.
I think it's similar with Visnovsky just that with Hemsky out there was nobody who could play his role and the team suffered in a bigger way.
Though Grebskhov is injured as well, Gilbert, Smid, and Souray are more than ample at making up extra ice time in the absence of Vis and Grebs.
I think because our blue line is so good right now (ignoring injuries) in terms of offensive production, one of Gilbert or Grebeskhov has to be moved in the off-season. Gilbert and Vis are favorite Oilers D but Grebs is clearly a younger D-man than eventually may be better than even Souray or Visnovsky. Gilbert is a top end guy but with the NTCs and NMCs presented by the contracts of #44 and #71, traded options are slim.
If the Oilers go with the "tried, tested, and true," they will move Grebeskhov. If they think, like me, that his solid play must rise above the organizational attachment to Tom Gilbert, then the Oilers are meritocratic and will resign Grebs long-term.
Trust me, it will be hard for all of us. I will have to hang up my Tom Gilbert jersey after only a few seasons... but some things must be done.
Regardless with how the blue line shapes out next season though, our best players are undoubtedly Hemsky and Visnovsky. Souray, Gilbert, Grebeshkov, Horcoff, and Roloson are the supporting cast.
by raventalon40 on Feb 22, 2009 1:38 AM MST reply actions
RT: Say what?! That's not how I saw it. The stats sheet says 26:07 TOI (3+ minutes more than Iginla, Cole, Hemsky or any other forward), 2 primary assists, 4 shots, 2 hits, 2 shot blocks, and that awesome night on the dot (23-9, 72%). He was even on the night, but really got hosed there, having just come on the ice on line changes for BOTH Calgary goals -- 3 seconds the first time, 4 the second, while being directly involved in both Oiler tallies. Moreover, he made Ugly look bad in several one-on-one battles, including the play that led directly to Cole's first goal. He was huge on the PK, and while the PP as a whole was definitely Atrocious -- cost us the frickin' game -- to lay all that on Shawn Horcoff would be a mistake. That's part of the game where I expect Ales Hemsky to shine ... and last night, he sure didn't.
I don't know WTF you want; Horc was named second star of the game, and if anything I thought that was a low ball. He was a horse.
One thing we do agree is on Grebs; I sure hope we can find a way to keep him around.
by Bruce on Feb 22, 2009 1:27 PM MST reply actions
by raventalon40 on Feb 22, 2009 7:38 PM MST reply actions
You certainly have a way with words Bruce....but be careful - this is exactly how Spiderman turned evil!:o)
by Oilman on Feb 25, 2009 2:21 PM MST reply actions
Bruce - I've been to your meteor rock site. Interesting stuff. What I can't quite figure out is how a chunk of heavy meteor rock falling at ridiculous speed to earth (I saw this event BTW) came to be embedded ever-so-gently in a pond. No real indications of impact, no pieces driven into the ice, no real indication anything happened other than some hot pieces of rock were placed on the ice and melted a bit in place. How is this possible? Was there a primary impact crater in the vicinity and these were secondary fragments? The simple M x V equation tells me this should have been a much more dramatic impact site. Thoughts?
Anyways, I am wondering why you haven't done an updated piece on the emergence of Zack as a bonafide player. The guy is starting to come on strong and I'd be interested to hear an intelligent take on this.
by David S on Mar 1, 2009 6:36 PM MST reply actions
David S: The meteoroid hit the atmosphere at some 14 km/s but experienced atmospheric drag on the way down which slowed it considerably, "similar to firing a bullet into water". Ultimately a meteoroid of that size, especially after breaking into fragments, will lose its cosmic velocity and achieve a terminal velocity on the order of 100-200 m/s, only about 1% of its original speed.
The biggest chunk known to be recovered (13 kg) landed on solid ground and left a pit about 10 cm deep.
I am wondering why you haven't done an updated piece on the emergence of Zack as a bonafide player. The guy is starting to come on strong and I'd be interested to hear an intelligent take on this.
I've been writing on and off, mostly on other blogs, about that emergence. This piece meant to touch in a somewhat tongue-in-cheek manner on his emerging prowess as a goal scorer, which is certainly an encouraging development. A huge goal against the Wild last night on an actual Shot put an exclamation point on a solid February (13 GP, 4-2-6, +2), very decent production for an 8-minute a game player. If only we could get our "second line" guys scoring like this!
by Bruce on Mar 2, 2009 12:33 AM MST reply actions
by raventalon40 on Mar 5, 2009 2:14 PM MST reply actions

by 































