There Is a Market for Sheldon Souray
Don't believe me? The evidence is all around us. NHL General Managers, a group that on an individual level can be very smart, can be very, very stupid when free agency roles around and there is a position of need. This year, the position of need for a lot of teams was defense. Here are a few samples:
*Mark Streit - 5 years, 20.5 million
*Wade Redden - 6 years, 39 million
*Brian Campbell - 8 years, 56.8 million
*Jeff Finger - 4 years, 14 million
and by way of comparison
*Sheldon Souray - 4 years (remaining), 21.6 million (cap hit)
The funny thing about these contracts is that the only one the national punditry (as a whole) are lampooning is the Finger contract.
Compared especially to the Redden contract (in my opinion, they're rather comparable as players- Redden is slightly more successful against certain competition, while Souray adds toughness and leadership) Souray's deal really doesn't look that bad, and could be moved (if he agrees to waive his NMC) to a team that missed out on the offensive defenseman it wanted so badly.
It really could happen.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
by budorduke on Jul 2, 2008 8:34 AM MDT reply actions
Who? Penner? Pisani?
Souray's offensive role, especially on the powerplay, can be covered by Visnovsky, and we can sign a cheaper and better defensive presence to fill his roster spot. It would save money and arguably improve the team to boot.
And I'm not arguing that the Souray contract is reasonable. I'm arguing it's more reasonable than, say, the Redden contract, which was just an asinine signing by a guy who should know better.
by Jonathan Willis on Jul 2, 2008 8:53 AM MDT reply actions
by budorduke on Jul 2, 2008 9:00 AM MDT reply actions
by Kent W. on Jul 2, 2008 10:53 AM MDT reply actions

by 






























