Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Two Minutes Of Thunder Basketball Wins The Game

UFA Option: Michael Ryder


After three straight 25-goal, 55-point+ seasons, Michael Ryder slipped to 14 goals and 31 points. A healthy scratch repeatedly during both the regular season and playoffs, he will not be tendered an offer by the Canadiens, and may be of interest to the Oilers. A persistent rumor around the 2008 trade deadline was Ryder to Edmonton for Jarret Stoll, although I can't comment on how much basis that had in reality.

Ryder averaged 11:01 at even strength and 2:07 on the powerplay (along with a few seconds shorthanded) in 2007-08, as opposed to 11:35 at evens, 0:48 shorthanded and 3:52 on the powerplay in 2006-07. More interesting, his points production at even strength dropped from 22 in 06-07 to 18 in 07-08, but he played 12 fewer games and averaged half a minute less per game, meaning that his points/60 actually went from 1.40 to 1.40! In other words- despite a 27 point drop, Ryder was just as effective at even strength scoring in 2007-08 as he was in 2006-07.

There is also some evidence that Ryder was actually more defensively effective at even strength this season as well. In 2006-07, Ryder faced the 9th most difficult minutes among Canadiens forwards with more than 20 games, and his team was outscored at a 2.25 GFON/60, 3.58 GAON/60 rate. This year, Ryder was in a tie for the 2nd most difficult minutes, and his team's GFON/60 rate went up slightly to 2.38, while the GAON/60 dropped to 2.62. While +/- isn't an entirely accurate measure of defensive performance, a goals against drop of .98/60 minutes of ice time is certainly indicative of something.

Having established that Ryder was not just as good, but actually better 5-on-5 in 2007-08, the cause for his decline in production becomes obvious- the powerplay.

Ryder had 34 powerplay points in 317.34 minutes of powerplay time in 2006-07, wile he notched 13 in 151.9 minutes in 2007-08. This works out to a points production decrease from 6.43/60 minutes in 2006-07 to 5.14/60 in 2007-08. Incidentally, in the same time span, team performance on the powerplay with Ryder on the ice went from +9.08 (the best number in the league in 2006-07) to +8.45 (2nd on the team only to Alex Kovalev). Given that those numbers happened on the league's best powerplay, they need to be taken with a grain of salt, but in both cases Ryder is obviously an excellent powerplay specialist. In point of fact, that's what his niche is at the NHL level- he's as obvious a powerplay specialist as there is in the league.

Ryder is almost certain to take a pay cut on the UFA market; and frankly I think the Oilers should look long and hard at signing him. Does he fill a vital team need? Not really. Consider, however, that his points/60 is better than every Oilers powerplay regular other than Ales Hemsky. He's only 28 years old. He's depreciated in value, despite being an almost identical player in terms of production; the only significant statistical difference between a good 2006-07 and an awful 2007-08 was ice-time. Play him maybe 10 minutes a night at even strength, and pop him on the first powerplay unit. He can be a useful asset going forward, and a cheap asset to boot, and that's something this team could really use. I sincerely hope that Michael Ryder is a player of interest to the Oilers.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from The Copper & Blue

Comments

Display:

I agree 100%. Hes a winger that shoots and would line up nicely on the first line. Not exactly an upgrade from Penner but Penner looked out of sorts playing with Hemsky and Horcoff last year as neither of the two play a half wall game.

by jdrevenge on Jun 17, 2008 4:07 PM MDT reply actions  

I agree 100%. Hes a winger that shoots and would line up nicely on the first line. Not exactly an upgrade from Penner but Penner looked out of sorts playing with Hemsky and Horcoff last year as neither of the two play a half wall game.

The only problem with putting Ryder on the first line is that it weakens it for a power-vs.-power matchup. I'd rather see him getting soft minutes in a supplementary role, and then getting big time on the powerplay.

by Jonathan Willis on Jun 17, 2008 4:53 PM MDT reply actions  

Tough to slot him into a supplementary role given the players we have on the team at this point in time. Would he be that much of an upgrade over Raf? In reading what you've wrote here hes pretty strong even strength and we have a lot of options for the PP. Ship Moreau out and put Raf in his place? or Ryder?

by jdrevenge on Jun 17, 2008 6:44 PM MDT reply actions  

Tough to slot him into a supplementary role given the players we have on the team at this point in time. Would he be that much of an upgrade over Raf? In reading what you've wrote here hes pretty strong even strength and we have a lot of options for the PP. Ship Moreau out and put Raf in his place? or Ryder?

Ryder was pretty good at even strength this year, but brutal last year. I'd guess his actual ability falls somewhere in between.
Honestly, I had him slotted for either the 2nd or the 4th line.

by Jonathan Willis on Jun 18, 2008 8:17 AM MDT reply actions  

The more i talk and think about the possibilities the Oilers have going into next season the more apparent it seems IMO that not a lot is going to happen. I think there is too much at stake if they let guys go prior to the midway point of the season. I think we're all going to have to be patient with the team this year and approach the season with some cautious optimism.

by jdrevenge on Jun 18, 2008 9:45 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL