Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods Makes His 2012 PGA Tour Debut

UFA Option: Marek Malik


Marek Malik is coming off a season that was both very bad and very good. Malik was a whipping boy for many Rangers fans, for many perceived sins; a lack of physical play, risky turnovers, and bickering with the coaching staff. I highly doubt he'll return to the Rangers, particularly after a highly public dispute with Rangers' coach Tom Renney. In addition to various injuries, Malik was a healthy scratch repeatedly. Glen Sather reportedly shopped him at the trade deadline, but evidently the price was too steep, because he couldn't find any takers.

Despite all these problems, the numbers say that Malik was an effective defenseman when he did play. He averaged 16:20 at even strength, 2:39 shorthanded, and 0:14 on the powerplay. According to Behind the Net, Malik played the most difficult minutes of any Rangers blueliner, and despite this finished with a +/- of 7. When he was on the ice, the Rangers averaged 2.99 GFON/60, and allowed only 1.63 GAON/60. Malik also had nice numbers on an excellent penalty kill, with the team allowing 4.94 goal/60 with him on the ice 4-on-5.

What about the accusations that Malik is soft, and prone to giveaways? Unfortunately, all we really have to work with statistically is what RTSS provides. Prorated over 82 games, Malik had 53 giveaways, 78 hits, and 88 shot-blocks. 53 giveaways would have ranked Malik 5th on the Oilers, behind Staios, Gilbert, Pitkanen and Grebeshkov. Even that is exaggerating, because if we prorate Matt Greene's and Sheldon Souray's totals over a full season, they also surpass Malik's. The 78 hits would have been only 3 back of Steve Staios (good for 3rd on the Oilers). The problem here is that people expect Malik to destroy opponents because of his size, but that simply isn't his game. He is effective, but not punishing. 88 shot blocks would have been 4th among Oilers defensemen.

I haven't seen much of Malik since he signed with the Rangers, but I do remember him well from his time in Vancouver, when he paired with Ed Jovanovski. My dad is a big Canucks fan, and I live in B.C., so I saw quite a few games. Jovanovski was a "chaos" defender, an incredibly talented player, but never quite the sum of his parts. I would describe his defensive zone coverage as sloppy and his decision making as erratic. He looked much better playing with Malik, because Malik played a very safe, clinical game. He used his incredible reach to limit his opponent's opportunities, he wasn't afraid to hit, and he could clear the crease. As I recall, the big knock on him was that there wasn't much offensive upside, and he was never a physically punishing player. But he's always been effective- we aren't talking Tom Poti here.

I imagine that by this juncture I've given away that I've always liked Malik; I'm a big fan of quietly effective players who are consistently underrated. Malik stabilizes things, he takes on the best players from the opposing team, and succeeds, and he would be an excellent partner for a high caliber defenseman who cheats to offense. The other thing about Malik is that he isn't going to be looking at a big contract. He may even wind up taking a cut from his 2.5 million dollar salary this year. All things considered, I think Marek Malik is a player of interest to the Oilers.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Isn't it a red-flag that he couldn't consistenly play on a Rangers defense that is suspect at best?

by Richard Pollock on Jun 13, 2008 10:22 AM MDT reply actions  

Isn't it a red-flag that he couldn't consistenly play on a Rangers defense that is suspect at best?

The Rangers defense was the 4th-best in the league statistically at 2.32 goals against per game, so I think when it comes to limiting chances against, they were doing pretty good.

I'm really not sure why Renney was using him the way he was. Renney's a good coach so it is a red flag that he was out of the lineup so often, but to my mind it's probably associated with nagging injuries to at least some degree (TSN says that Malik had, at various points in the season, both upper body and knee injuries). Beyond that, I'm not sure if it was attitude adjustment (ala Stoll/Torres in Edmonton) or if Malik's errors tend to be of the brutally obvious leading to goals against variety, or if it was a desire to play some of the youth on the blueline (Staal, Tyutin, Girardi, etc.). Too many variables.

by Jonathan Willis on Jun 13, 2008 10:58 AM MDT reply actions  

2.32 goals per game is deceiving because of the style the Rangers played all season. Plus the fact that they have an all-world netminder.

When Jason Strudwick is getting into the Rangers line-up and Malik can't get a regular shift, I'd probably be concerned.

Never mind the fact that he had some attitude problems this season.

The Oilers should channel their interest elsewhere.

by Richard Pollock on Jun 13, 2008 11:19 AM MDT reply actions  

When Jason Strudwick is getting into the Rangers line-up and Malik can't get a regular shift, I'd probably be concerned.

Oh, I don't know, Strudwick seems like a guy who was bound to become some coach's favourite. It's like in Calgary where Keenan insists on dressing Godard, or even Wayne Primeau over players with substantially better results. Trevor Linden was a consistent healthy scratch early in Alain Vigneault's tenure, and while not a terrific player, he certainly had better results than many of the other AHL'ers that were inserted in his place, as he showed down the stretch and in the 2007 playoffs.

Point being, statistically, Malik looks awfully good, and unless he's taken some significant steps back in the last few seasons (in the time I haven't seen much of him) he's probably still effective.

I'd counter the number of scratches with the use to which Renney put Malik- in 2006-07, when Malik was +32, he was playing the easiest opponents of anyone other than Kasparaitis and Ozolinsh. This year, he played the toughest opponents. Why the shift if Renney feels he wasn't capable? I don't think it had much to do with actual effectiveness and more to do with personalities clashing, nagging injuries, and a desire to play youth. Then again, I have to confess I don't follow the Rangers closely enough to know for sure.

by Jonathan Willis on Jun 13, 2008 11:31 AM MDT reply actions  

In the small amount of games I saw him play (5-10) he wasn't the defenseman that he was 3-4 years ago.

I guess my biggest question is: Where would he fit in on the Oilers blue-line?

He isn't going to play an power play. Who is he going to play over of these top 6: Souray, Pitkanen (assuming he returns) Staios, Gilbert, Grebshkov, Smid and Greene.

If you make the argument he can be more productive than some of those players, that's fine (even though I don't agree). But say he doesn't, and then he is back on the bench. He already proved this year he doesn't handle that well. Plus, who needs a veteran 5/6 defenseman when you can let a younger player develop for cheap?

The Oilers, as most Oilers bloggers are pointing out, aren't contenders just yet, so why be interested in an old defenseman who would only cut into the ice-time, and therefore progress, of young defenders.

by Richard Pollock on Jun 13, 2008 11:53 AM MDT reply actions  

In the small amount of games I saw him play (5-10) he wasn't the defenseman that he was 3-4 years ago.

If that's the case, than absolutely I wouldn't be interested in him. I don't see it statistically, but statistics sure aren't perfect. I'm sure the pro scouts have a good idea of what he can accomplish.

I guess my biggest question is: Where would he fit in on the Oilers blue-line?

He isn't going to play an power play. Who is he going to play over of these top 6: Souray, Pitkanen (assuming he returns) Staios, Gilbert, Grebshkov, Smid and Greene.


Well, for starters, Souray is always an injury risk, and as for Matt Greene he was shielded all season and still wasn't terribly effective. As for who he could play above, (caveats being that I'm judging this on statistics and what I remember of him from Vancouver) he should certainly be more capable of playing tough opposition than anyone on that list other than Pitkanen and Gilbert, who were the only Oilers defenders who didn't get lit up by top opponents last season. Our team defense ranked 27th in the league, so it isn't exactly a formidable group, despite the wishful thinking that goes on among some Oilers fans.

If you make the argument he can be more productive than some of those players, that's fine (even though I don't agree). But say he doesn't, and then he is back on the bench. He already proved this year he doesn't handle that well. Plus, who needs a veteran 5/6 defenseman when you can let a younger player develop for cheap?

Not more productive offensively, but certainly more reliable defensively than virtually every Oilers defenseman. As for the "developing for cheap" argument, it really doesn't work. Souray, Staios are vets and paid. Pitkanen and Gilbert are both getting significant coin next season. That leaves Smid (cheap), Greene (1.15M, RFA next year) and Grebeshkov (1.5M, RFA next year). Greene is a liability who must be sheltered and really isn't inexpensive for what he is right now (6/7 defenseman) and Grebeshkov isn't much cheaper and will certainly get big money next season if he plays like he did toward the tail end of 07-08. The only significantly cheaper option is Smid, who I absolutely feel needs to be allowed to develop.

by Jonathan Willis on Jun 13, 2008 12:06 PM MDT reply actions  

By developing for cheap, I mean why would you sign Malik for a similar amount to what the younger guys are making when there is hardly any upside. The young players still need the ice-time and experience to develop. With Malik, there is no development going on.

Plus, even if the Oilers defensemen become restricted free agents, they are still assets.

by Richard Pollock on Jun 13, 2008 12:12 PM MDT reply actions  

By developing for cheap, I mean why would you sign Malik for a similar amount to what the younger guys are making when there is hardly any upside. The young players still need the ice-time and experience to develop. With Malik, there is no development going on.

I'm not saying jettison all the young guys; I'm arguing that adding one veteran at the expense of one youngster (who can be traded for a draft pick, which is still an asset) will make the Oilers a significantly better team, and may even help the development of the remaining youth.

I'm willing to accept that Malik may not be the guy, but I think somebody needs to be brought in.

by Jonathan Willis on Jun 13, 2008 12:19 PM MDT reply actions  

Good back and forth. Keep up the great articles.

by Richard Pollock on Jun 13, 2008 12:29 PM MDT reply actions  

Good back and forth. Keep up the great articles.

Thanks ;) Constructive debate is always fun, because it forces you to examine angles you haven't considered, and re-examine angles in your own arguments.

by Jonathan Willis on Jun 13, 2008 12:33 PM MDT reply actions  

FYI, I linked to this article from Oilfans in a discussion about Rozsival. Is there any chance you'd cast your critical eye on him?

Just a terrific series of articles on the current crop of UFAs.

by Marchantfan on Jun 26, 2008 10:05 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Calgary 54 25 22 7 57
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.9.2012 at 7:25 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-39, .571)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL