Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Austin Rivers' Buzzer Beater Finishes Off UNC

Three Defencemen

My personal belief is that Joni Pitkanen will not play another game in an Oilers uniform. I think Lowe looked at his core, young defencemen (Gilbert, Grebeshkov, Pitkanen), and decided that Gilbert & Grebeshkov would be on the team moving forwar, whereas Pitkanen would not. I fully expect a trade at the draft, unless they really feel like waiting to see if an RFA offer sheet comes in.

Now, I've been wrong before, but if this scenario works out as I've outlined it, I think it behooves us to take a detailed statistical look at these three 1983-born defencemen.

Even strength TOI: Pitkanen: 16.92, Gilbert: 16.44, Grebeshkov: 13.10
Even strength PTS/60: Gilbert: .98, Pitkanen: .84, Grebeshkov: .84
EV GFON/60: Pitkanen: 3.10, Grebeshkov: 2.90, Gilbert: 2.89
EV GAON/60: Grebeshkov: 2.64, Gilbert: 2.98, Pitkanen: 3.10
+/- ON/60: Grebeshkov: +.26, Pitkanen: 0, Gilbert: -.09
Quality Comp - Quality Team (Matchup): Pitkanen: .06, Gilbert: .03, Grebeshkov: -.04

To summarize, at even strength Pitkanen played the most difficult matchup, and the most ice time, and finished pretty even. Gilbert played the second most difficult matchup, with the second most minutes, and finished a bit behind, while Grebeshkov played the easiest matchup, and the fewest minutes, and had good results. Nothing to really get excited about, difference-wise between the players, but I think if I could only keep two, Gilbert would be out of town.

PP TOI/60: Pitkanen: 4.07, Gilbert: 2.19, Grebeshkov: 2.02
PP PTS/60: Gilbert: 3.01, Pitkanen: 2.11, Grebeshkov: 1.26
GF ON/60: Grebeshkov: 6.71, Gilbert: 5.36, Pitkanen: 5.15
GA ON/60: Grebeshkov: .42, Gilbert: 1.67, Pitkanen: 1.87
+/- ON/60: Grebeshkov: +6.29, Gilbert: +3.68, Pitkanen: +3.28

In summary, despite being the PP defenceman of choice, Pitkanen's offensive numbers are not good, while his +/- ratio is the worst of the three. The oddest statistic here is the differential between Grebeshkov's points production and the powerplay's performance when he's on the ice. Based on this data, Joni is not a powerplay guy, while Grebeshkov is shockingly effective and perhaps underutilized, despite poor personal point production. Advantage: Grebeshkov, Gilbert.

SH TOI/60: Gilbert: 2.40, Pitkanen: 1.93, Grebeshkov: 1.13
GF ON/60: Pitkanen: 1.48, Gilbert: 0.92, Grebeshkov: 0.75
GA ON/60: Pitkanen: 3.94, Gilbert: 4.88, Grebeshkov: 8.96
+/- ON/60: Pitkanen: -2.46, Gilbert: -3.97, Grebeshkov: -8.21

Now, if the powerplay numbers left you think Joni isn't suited to special teams play, just look at these. Despite being under-utilized, he's far and away been the most effective skater on the PK all season, adding offence without sacrificing defence. Gilbert's numbers are okay, and of Grebeshkov perhaps the less said, the better.

I think that these statistics show us that Pitkanen is the best of the three defenders in all situations, with Grebeshkov being effective on the PP and in a somewhat sheltered EV role, while Gilbert looks okay pretty much everywhere, but is the weakest of the three at even strength. Does that seem right? It does to me. Given that this is the weakest season for Pitkanen since his rookie year, I don't think placing him under Gilbert is a good decision, even in light of the fact he's likely to recieve a significantly higher return on the trade market.

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice work Jonathan. I've always enjoyed your commentary and it's good to see you've started your own blog. Nice stats-based analysis so far. I particualrly like the Quality of Matchup stat "introduced" in this entry. ;-)

Keep up the good work ... I look forward to dropping in from time to time.

by Bruce on Apr 14, 2008 12:11 AM MDT reply actions  

Thanks, Bruce ;)

by Jonathan Willis on Apr 15, 2008 6:18 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 54 34 15 5 73
Minnesota 54 25 21 8 58
Calgary 55 25 22 8 58
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.10.2012 at 1:26 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-39, .571)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL